Low-Cost Airports for Low-Cost Airlines: Flexible Design to Manage the Risks

The paradigm of airport planning and design is changing fundamentally. Low-cost airlines have become significant drivers of airport planning, along with aircraft size and other technical factors. They have different requirements than the “legacy” carriers. They focus on cost and on alternative ways...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: de Neufville, Richard
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102891
_version_ 1826204335006023680
author de Neufville, Richard
author_facet de Neufville, Richard
author_sort de Neufville, Richard
collection MIT
description The paradigm of airport planning and design is changing fundamentally. Low-cost airlines have become significant drivers of airport planning, along with aircraft size and other technical factors. They have different requirements than the “legacy” carriers. They focus on cost and on alternative ways to handle passengers. Now being sizeable participants in the air transport industry, they are influencing airport design. They are central to the proliferation of secondary airports and metropolitan multi-airport systems. They are catalyzing the development of cheaper airport terminals configured internally much differently than traditional designs. These factors lead to the creation of “low-cost airports” for low cost carriers around the “legacy main airports” built to serve the “legacy airlines”. Consistent with economic theory, the competition between the legacy and low cost airlines is extending to their major factors of production, that is, the airports. This competitive reality creates great uncertainty and poses substantial strategic issues for airport and airline managers and planners. The paradigm shift introduces great risks into practice. The paper proposes a flexible design strategy to deal with such uncertainties. This is significantly different from traditional airport master planning. The core element is to build “real options” into the design, which allow the airport owners to match the development to the way the traffic demands unfold in the decades ahead. A review of developments in Portugal illustrates the current risks in airport development, and suggests how airport owners and investors could apply flexible design process to develop a strategy that would manage these uncertainties to maximize expected value.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T12:53:01Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/102891
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T12:53:01Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1028912019-04-11T05:37:56Z Low-Cost Airports for Low-Cost Airlines: Flexible Design to Manage the Risks de Neufville, Richard The paradigm of airport planning and design is changing fundamentally. Low-cost airlines have become significant drivers of airport planning, along with aircraft size and other technical factors. They have different requirements than the “legacy” carriers. They focus on cost and on alternative ways to handle passengers. Now being sizeable participants in the air transport industry, they are influencing airport design. They are central to the proliferation of secondary airports and metropolitan multi-airport systems. They are catalyzing the development of cheaper airport terminals configured internally much differently than traditional designs. These factors lead to the creation of “low-cost airports” for low cost carriers around the “legacy main airports” built to serve the “legacy airlines”. Consistent with economic theory, the competition between the legacy and low cost airlines is extending to their major factors of production, that is, the airports. This competitive reality creates great uncertainty and poses substantial strategic issues for airport and airline managers and planners. The paradigm shift introduces great risks into practice. The paper proposes a flexible design strategy to deal with such uncertainties. This is significantly different from traditional airport master planning. The core element is to build “real options” into the design, which allow the airport owners to match the development to the way the traffic demands unfold in the decades ahead. A review of developments in Portugal illustrates the current risks in airport development, and suggests how airport owners and investors could apply flexible design process to develop a strategy that would manage these uncertainties to maximize expected value. 2016-06-03T01:37:01Z 2016-06-03T01:37:01Z 2007-03 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102891 en_US ESD Working Papers;ESD-WP-2007-15 application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
spellingShingle de Neufville, Richard
Low-Cost Airports for Low-Cost Airlines: Flexible Design to Manage the Risks
title Low-Cost Airports for Low-Cost Airlines: Flexible Design to Manage the Risks
title_full Low-Cost Airports for Low-Cost Airlines: Flexible Design to Manage the Risks
title_fullStr Low-Cost Airports for Low-Cost Airlines: Flexible Design to Manage the Risks
title_full_unstemmed Low-Cost Airports for Low-Cost Airlines: Flexible Design to Manage the Risks
title_short Low-Cost Airports for Low-Cost Airlines: Flexible Design to Manage the Risks
title_sort low cost airports for low cost airlines flexible design to manage the risks
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102891
work_keys_str_mv AT deneufvillerichard lowcostairportsforlowcostairlinesflexibledesigntomanagetherisks