Accommodating Presuppositions Is Inappropriate in Implausible Contexts

According to one view of linguistic information (Karttunen, 1974; Stalnaker, 1974), a speaker can convey contextually new information in one of two ways: (a) by asserting the content as new information; or (b) by presupposing the content as given information which would then have to be accommodated....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Singh, Raj, Fedorenko, Evelina G., Mahowald, Kyle Adam, Gibson, Edward A.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: John Wiley & Sons 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102974
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3823-514X
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-8716
_version_ 1826213958706528256
author Singh, Raj
Fedorenko, Evelina G.
Mahowald, Kyle Adam
Gibson, Edward A.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Singh, Raj
Fedorenko, Evelina G.
Mahowald, Kyle Adam
Gibson, Edward A.
author_sort Singh, Raj
collection MIT
description According to one view of linguistic information (Karttunen, 1974; Stalnaker, 1974), a speaker can convey contextually new information in one of two ways: (a) by asserting the content as new information; or (b) by presupposing the content as given information which would then have to be accommodated. This distinction predicts that it is conversationally more appropriate to assert implausible information rather than presuppose it (e.g., von Fintel, 2008; Heim, 1992; Stalnaker, 2002). A second view rejects the assumption that presuppositions are accommodated; instead, presuppositions are assimilated into asserted content and both are correspondingly open to challenge (e.g., Gazdar, 1979; van der Sandt, 1992). Under this view, we should not expect to find a difference in conversational appropriateness between asserting implausible information and presupposing it. To distinguish between these two views of linguistic information, we performed two self-paced reading experiments with an on-line stops-making-sense judgment. The results of the two experiments—using the presupposition triggers the and too—show that accommodation is inappropriate (makes less sense) relative to non-presuppositional controls when the presupposed information is implausible but not when it is plausible. These results provide support for the first view of linguistic information: the contrast in implausible contexts can only be explained if there is a presupposition-assertion distinction and accommodation is a mechanism dedicated to reasoning about presuppositions.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:57:33Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/102974
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:57:33Z
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley & Sons
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1029742022-09-29T17:20:38Z Accommodating Presuppositions Is Inappropriate in Implausible Contexts Singh, Raj Fedorenko, Evelina G. Mahowald, Kyle Adam Gibson, Edward A. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT Gibson, Edward A. Fedorenko, Evelina G. Mahowald, Kyle Adam Gibson, Edward A. According to one view of linguistic information (Karttunen, 1974; Stalnaker, 1974), a speaker can convey contextually new information in one of two ways: (a) by asserting the content as new information; or (b) by presupposing the content as given information which would then have to be accommodated. This distinction predicts that it is conversationally more appropriate to assert implausible information rather than presuppose it (e.g., von Fintel, 2008; Heim, 1992; Stalnaker, 2002). A second view rejects the assumption that presuppositions are accommodated; instead, presuppositions are assimilated into asserted content and both are correspondingly open to challenge (e.g., Gazdar, 1979; van der Sandt, 1992). Under this view, we should not expect to find a difference in conversational appropriateness between asserting implausible information and presupposing it. To distinguish between these two views of linguistic information, we performed two self-paced reading experiments with an on-line stops-making-sense judgment. The results of the two experiments—using the presupposition triggers the and too—show that accommodation is inappropriate (makes less sense) relative to non-presuppositional controls when the presupposed information is implausible but not when it is plausible. These results provide support for the first view of linguistic information: the contrast in implausible contexts can only be explained if there is a presupposition-assertion distinction and accommodation is a mechanism dedicated to reasoning about presuppositions. 2016-06-06T15:11:10Z 2016-06-06T15:11:10Z 2015-02 2014-12 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 03640213 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102974 Singh, Raj, Evelina Fedorenko, Kyle Mahowald, and Edward Gibson. “Accommodating Presuppositions Is Inappropriate in Implausible Contexts.” Cogn Sci 40, no. 3 (July 8, 2015): 607–634. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3823-514X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-8716 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12260 Cognitive Science Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf John Wiley & Sons Prof. Gibson via Courtney Crummett
spellingShingle Singh, Raj
Fedorenko, Evelina G.
Mahowald, Kyle Adam
Gibson, Edward A.
Accommodating Presuppositions Is Inappropriate in Implausible Contexts
title Accommodating Presuppositions Is Inappropriate in Implausible Contexts
title_full Accommodating Presuppositions Is Inappropriate in Implausible Contexts
title_fullStr Accommodating Presuppositions Is Inappropriate in Implausible Contexts
title_full_unstemmed Accommodating Presuppositions Is Inappropriate in Implausible Contexts
title_short Accommodating Presuppositions Is Inappropriate in Implausible Contexts
title_sort accommodating presuppositions is inappropriate in implausible contexts
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102974
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3823-514X
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-883X
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-8716
work_keys_str_mv AT singhraj accommodatingpresuppositionsisinappropriateinimplausiblecontexts
AT fedorenkoevelinag accommodatingpresuppositionsisinappropriateinimplausiblecontexts
AT mahowaldkyleadam accommodatingpresuppositionsisinappropriateinimplausiblecontexts
AT gibsonedwarda accommodatingpresuppositionsisinappropriateinimplausiblecontexts