Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology

1. Introduction 1.1. Summary of Atkinson 2011 Atkinson (2011) sets out to test the so-called “serial founder model” against crosslinguistic data on phonological diversity. In his words (Atkinson 2011: Supporting Online Material: 3), the serial founder model predicts that [. . . ] during populatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaeger, T. Florian, Graff, Peter, Croft, William, Pontillo, Daniel
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Walter de Gruyter 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103092
_version_ 1811073013798404096
author Jaeger, T. Florian
Graff, Peter
Croft, William
Pontillo, Daniel
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Jaeger, T. Florian
Graff, Peter
Croft, William
Pontillo, Daniel
author_sort Jaeger, T. Florian
collection MIT
description 1. Introduction 1.1. Summary of Atkinson 2011 Atkinson (2011) sets out to test the so-called “serial founder model” against crosslinguistic data on phonological diversity. In his words (Atkinson 2011: Supporting Online Material: 3), the serial founder model predicts that [. . . ] during population expansion, small founder groups are expected to carry less phonemic diversity than their larger parent populations. A series of founder events should produce a gradient of decreasing phonemic diversity with increasing distance from the origin. To test this hypothesis, Atkinson employs a sample of 504 non-extinct languages from WALS (Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2008), for which the number of vowels, the number of consonants, and the number of tones in the language are annotated (Maddieson 2008a, b, c). For the main analysis, these three measures were standardized (i.e., the mean was subtracted from each value, which was then divided by the standard deviation of the measure) and averaged into one combined measure of the total phonological diversity of a language. This normalized phonological diversity measure ranges from −1.19 to 1.68 (mean =0.02). Each language is also annotated for its coordinates on the globe as well as it population size (the number of speakers).
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:27:18Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/103092
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:27:18Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Walter de Gruyter
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1030922022-09-26T11:30:37Z Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology Jaeger, T. Florian Graff, Peter Croft, William Pontillo, Daniel Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Graff, Peter 1. Introduction 1.1. Summary of Atkinson 2011 Atkinson (2011) sets out to test the so-called “serial founder model” against crosslinguistic data on phonological diversity. In his words (Atkinson 2011: Supporting Online Material: 3), the serial founder model predicts that [. . . ] during population expansion, small founder groups are expected to carry less phonemic diversity than their larger parent populations. A series of founder events should produce a gradient of decreasing phonemic diversity with increasing distance from the origin. To test this hypothesis, Atkinson employs a sample of 504 non-extinct languages from WALS (Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2008), for which the number of vowels, the number of consonants, and the number of tones in the language are annotated (Maddieson 2008a, b, c). For the main analysis, these three measures were standardized (i.e., the mean was subtracted from each value, which was then divided by the standard deviation of the measure) and averaged into one combined measure of the total phonological diversity of a language. This normalized phonological diversity measure ranges from −1.19 to 1.68 (mean =0.02). Each language is also annotated for its coordinates on the globe as well as it population size (the number of speakers). Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Fellowship) University of Rochester Medical Center (Wilmot award) 2016-06-09T18:35:40Z 2016-06-09T18:35:40Z 2011-11 2011-09 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1430-0532 1613-415X http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103092 Jaeger, T. Florian, Peter Graff, William Croft, and Daniel Pontillo. “Mixed Effect Models for Genetic and Areal Dependencies in Linguistic Typology.” Linguistic Typology 15, no. 2 (January 2011). © 2011 Walter de Gruyter. en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/lity.2011.021 Linguistic Typology Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Walter de Gruyter Walter de Gruyter
spellingShingle Jaeger, T. Florian
Graff, Peter
Croft, William
Pontillo, Daniel
Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology
title Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology
title_full Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology
title_fullStr Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology
title_full_unstemmed Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology
title_short Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology
title_sort mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103092
work_keys_str_mv AT jaegertflorian mixedeffectmodelsforgeneticandarealdependenciesinlinguistictypology
AT graffpeter mixedeffectmodelsforgeneticandarealdependenciesinlinguistictypology
AT croftwilliam mixedeffectmodelsforgeneticandarealdependenciesinlinguistictypology
AT pontillodaniel mixedeffectmodelsforgeneticandarealdependenciesinlinguistictypology