Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces

Formation, adhesion, and accumulation of ice, snow, frost, glaze, rime, or their mixtures can cause severe problems for solar panels, wind turbines, aircrafts, heat pumps, power lines, telecommunication equipment, and submarines. These problems can decrease efficiency in power generation, increase e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sojoudi, Hossein, Wang, M., Boscher, Nicolas, McKinley, Gareth H., Gleason, Karen K.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103351
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-1056
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-2779
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-9640
_version_ 1811072338627657728
author Sojoudi, Hossein
Wang, M.
Boscher, Nicolas
McKinley, Gareth H.
Gleason, Karen K.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Sojoudi, Hossein
Wang, M.
Boscher, Nicolas
McKinley, Gareth H.
Gleason, Karen K.
author_sort Sojoudi, Hossein
collection MIT
description Formation, adhesion, and accumulation of ice, snow, frost, glaze, rime, or their mixtures can cause severe problems for solar panels, wind turbines, aircrafts, heat pumps, power lines, telecommunication equipment, and submarines. These problems can decrease efficiency in power generation, increase energy consumption, result in mechanical and/or electrical failure, and generate safety hazards. To address these issues, the fundamentals of interfaces between liquids and surfaces at low temperatures have been extensively studied. This has lead to development of so called “icephobic” surfaces, which possess a number of overlapping, yet distinctive, characteristics from superhydrophobic surfaces. Less attention has been given to distinguishing differences between formation and adhesion of ice, snow, glaze, rime, and frost or to developing a clear definition for icephobic, or more correctly pagophobic, surfaces. In this review, we strive to clarify these differences and distinctions, while providing a comprehensive definition of icephobicity. We classify different canonical families of icephobic (pagophobic) surfaces providing a review of those with potential for scalable and robust development.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:04:25Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/103351
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:04:25Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1033512022-09-26T10:16:00Z Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces Sojoudi, Hossein Wang, M. Boscher, Nicolas McKinley, Gareth H. Gleason, Karen K. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering Sojoudi, Hossein Wang, M. Boscher, Nicolas McKinley, Gareth H. Gleason, Karen K. Formation, adhesion, and accumulation of ice, snow, frost, glaze, rime, or their mixtures can cause severe problems for solar panels, wind turbines, aircrafts, heat pumps, power lines, telecommunication equipment, and submarines. These problems can decrease efficiency in power generation, increase energy consumption, result in mechanical and/or electrical failure, and generate safety hazards. To address these issues, the fundamentals of interfaces between liquids and surfaces at low temperatures have been extensively studied. This has lead to development of so called “icephobic” surfaces, which possess a number of overlapping, yet distinctive, characteristics from superhydrophobic surfaces. Less attention has been given to distinguishing differences between formation and adhesion of ice, snow, glaze, rime, and frost or to developing a clear definition for icephobic, or more correctly pagophobic, surfaces. In this review, we strive to clarify these differences and distinctions, while providing a comprehensive definition of icephobicity. We classify different canonical families of icephobic (pagophobic) surfaces providing a review of those with potential for scalable and robust development. Kuwait-MIT Center for Natural Resources and the Environment MIT-Chevron university partnership program Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (Contract DAAD-19-02D-002) United States. Army Research Office Luxembourg National Research Fund 2016-06-27T15:16:55Z 2016-06-27T15:16:55Z 2016-02 2015-09 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1744-683X 1744-6848 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103351 Sojoudi, H., M. Wang, N. D. Boscher, G. H. McKinley, and K. K. Gleason. “Durable and Scalable Icephobic Surfaces: Similarities and Distinctions from Superhydrophobic Surfaces.” Soft Matter 12, no. 7 (2016): 1938–1963. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-1056 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-2779 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-9640 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5sm02295a Soft Matter Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ application/pdf Royal Society of Chemistry Royal Society of Chemistry
spellingShingle Sojoudi, Hossein
Wang, M.
Boscher, Nicolas
McKinley, Gareth H.
Gleason, Karen K.
Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces
title Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces
title_full Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces
title_fullStr Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces
title_short Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces
title_sort durable and scalable icephobic surfaces similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103351
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-1056
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-2779
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-9640
work_keys_str_mv AT sojoudihossein durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces
AT wangm durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces
AT boschernicolas durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces
AT mckinleygarethh durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces
AT gleasonkarenk durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces