Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces
Formation, adhesion, and accumulation of ice, snow, frost, glaze, rime, or their mixtures can cause severe problems for solar panels, wind turbines, aircrafts, heat pumps, power lines, telecommunication equipment, and submarines. These problems can decrease efficiency in power generation, increase e...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Royal Society of Chemistry
2016
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103351 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-1056 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-2779 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-9640 |
_version_ | 1811072338627657728 |
---|---|
author | Sojoudi, Hossein Wang, M. Boscher, Nicolas McKinley, Gareth H. Gleason, Karen K. |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering Sojoudi, Hossein Wang, M. Boscher, Nicolas McKinley, Gareth H. Gleason, Karen K. |
author_sort | Sojoudi, Hossein |
collection | MIT |
description | Formation, adhesion, and accumulation of ice, snow, frost, glaze, rime, or their mixtures can cause severe problems for solar panels, wind turbines, aircrafts, heat pumps, power lines, telecommunication equipment, and submarines. These problems can decrease efficiency in power generation, increase energy consumption, result in mechanical and/or electrical failure, and generate safety hazards. To address these issues, the fundamentals of interfaces between liquids and surfaces at low temperatures have been extensively studied. This has lead to development of so called “icephobic” surfaces, which possess a number of overlapping, yet distinctive, characteristics from superhydrophobic surfaces. Less attention has been given to distinguishing differences between formation and adhesion of ice, snow, glaze, rime, and frost or to developing a clear definition for icephobic, or more correctly pagophobic, surfaces. In this review, we strive to clarify these differences and distinctions, while providing a comprehensive definition of icephobicity. We classify different canonical families of icephobic (pagophobic) surfaces providing a review of those with potential for scalable and robust development. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T09:04:25Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/103351 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | en_US |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T09:04:25Z |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1033512022-09-26T10:16:00Z Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces Sojoudi, Hossein Wang, M. Boscher, Nicolas McKinley, Gareth H. Gleason, Karen K. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering Sojoudi, Hossein Wang, M. Boscher, Nicolas McKinley, Gareth H. Gleason, Karen K. Formation, adhesion, and accumulation of ice, snow, frost, glaze, rime, or their mixtures can cause severe problems for solar panels, wind turbines, aircrafts, heat pumps, power lines, telecommunication equipment, and submarines. These problems can decrease efficiency in power generation, increase energy consumption, result in mechanical and/or electrical failure, and generate safety hazards. To address these issues, the fundamentals of interfaces between liquids and surfaces at low temperatures have been extensively studied. This has lead to development of so called “icephobic” surfaces, which possess a number of overlapping, yet distinctive, characteristics from superhydrophobic surfaces. Less attention has been given to distinguishing differences between formation and adhesion of ice, snow, glaze, rime, and frost or to developing a clear definition for icephobic, or more correctly pagophobic, surfaces. In this review, we strive to clarify these differences and distinctions, while providing a comprehensive definition of icephobicity. We classify different canonical families of icephobic (pagophobic) surfaces providing a review of those with potential for scalable and robust development. Kuwait-MIT Center for Natural Resources and the Environment MIT-Chevron university partnership program Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (Contract DAAD-19-02D-002) United States. Army Research Office Luxembourg National Research Fund 2016-06-27T15:16:55Z 2016-06-27T15:16:55Z 2016-02 2015-09 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1744-683X 1744-6848 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103351 Sojoudi, H., M. Wang, N. D. Boscher, G. H. McKinley, and K. K. Gleason. “Durable and Scalable Icephobic Surfaces: Similarities and Distinctions from Superhydrophobic Surfaces.” Soft Matter 12, no. 7 (2016): 1938–1963. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-1056 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-2779 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-9640 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5sm02295a Soft Matter Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ application/pdf Royal Society of Chemistry Royal Society of Chemistry |
spellingShingle | Sojoudi, Hossein Wang, M. Boscher, Nicolas McKinley, Gareth H. Gleason, Karen K. Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces |
title | Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces |
title_full | Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces |
title_fullStr | Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces |
title_short | Durable and scalable icephobic surfaces: similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces |
title_sort | durable and scalable icephobic surfaces similarities and distinctions from superhydrophobic surfaces |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103351 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-1056 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-2779 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-9640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sojoudihossein durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces AT wangm durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces AT boschernicolas durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces AT mckinleygarethh durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces AT gleasonkarenk durableandscalableicephobicsurfacessimilaritiesanddistinctionsfromsuperhydrophobicsurfaces |