The value proposition of distributed satellite systems for space science missions

Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Corbin, Benjamin Andrew
Other Authors: Jeffrey Hoffman.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103442
_version_ 1826192429445808128
author Corbin, Benjamin Andrew
author2 Jeffrey Hoffman.
author_facet Jeffrey Hoffman.
Corbin, Benjamin Andrew
author_sort Corbin, Benjamin Andrew
collection MIT
description Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:11:52Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/103442
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:11:52Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1034422019-04-11T13:18:32Z The value proposition of distributed satellite systems for space science missions Corbin, Benjamin Andrew Jeffrey Hoffman. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Aeronautics and Astronautics. Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 382-402). The resources available for planetary science missions are finite and subject to some uncertainty. Despite decreasing costs of spacecraft components and launch services, the cost of space science missions is increasing, causing some missions to be canceled or delayed, and fewer science groups have the opportunity to achieve their goals due to budget limits. New methods in systems engineering have been developed to evaluate flexible systems and their sustained lifecycle value, but these methods are not yet employed by space agencies in the early stages of a mission's design. Previous studies of distributed satellite systems (DSS) showed that they are rarely competitive with monolithic systems; however, comparatively little research has focused on how DSS can be used to achieve new, fundamental space science goals that simply cannot be achieved with monolithic systems. The Responsive Systems Comparison (RSC) method combines Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration with Epoch-Era Analysis to examine benefits, costs, and flexible options in complex systems over the mission lifecycle. Modifications to the RSC method as it exists in previously published literature were made in order to more accurately characterize how value is derived from space science missions. A tiered structure in multi-attribute utility theory allows attributes of complex systems to be mentally compartmentalized by stakeholders and more explicitly shows synergy between complementary science goals. New metrics help rank designs by the value derived over their entire mission lifecycle and show more accurate cumulative value distributions. A complete list of the emergent capabilities of DSS was defined through the examination of the potential benefits of DSS as well as other science campaigns that leverage multiple assets to achieve their scientific goals. Three distinct categories consisting of seven total unique capabilities related to scientific data sampling and collection were identified and defined. The three broad categories are fundamentally unique, analytically unique, and operationally unique capabilities. This work uses RSC to examine four case studies of DSS missions that achieve new space science goals by leveraging these emergent capabilities. ExoplanetSat leverages shared sampling to conduct observations of necessary frequency and length to detect transiting exoplanets. HOBOCOP leverages simultaneous sampling and stacked sampling to study the Sun in far greater detail than any previous mission. ÆGIR leverages census sampling and self-sampling to catalog asteroids for future ISRU and mining operations. GANGMIR leverages staged sampling with sacrifice sampling and stacked sampling to answer fundamental questions related to the future human exploration of Mars. In all four case studies, RSC showed how scientific value was gained that would. be impossible or unsatisfactory with monolithic systems. Information gained in these studies helped stakeholders more accurately understand the risks and opportunities that arise as a result of the added flexibility in these missions. The wide scope of these case studies demonstrates how RSC can be applied to any science mission, especially one with goals that are more easily achieved with (or impossible to achieve without) DSS. Each study serves as a blueprint for how to conduct a Pre-Phase A study using these methods. by Benjamin Andrew Corbin. Ph. D. 2016-07-01T18:40:50Z 2016-07-01T18:40:50Z 2015 2015 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103442 952092731 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 419 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Corbin, Benjamin Andrew
The value proposition of distributed satellite systems for space science missions
title The value proposition of distributed satellite systems for space science missions
title_full The value proposition of distributed satellite systems for space science missions
title_fullStr The value proposition of distributed satellite systems for space science missions
title_full_unstemmed The value proposition of distributed satellite systems for space science missions
title_short The value proposition of distributed satellite systems for space science missions
title_sort value proposition of distributed satellite systems for space science missions
topic Aeronautics and Astronautics.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103442
work_keys_str_mv AT corbinbenjaminandrew thevaluepropositionofdistributedsatellitesystemsforspacesciencemissions
AT corbinbenjaminandrew valuepropositionofdistributedsatellitesystemsforspacesciencemissions