Using inclusive wealth as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation

Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, 2015.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Collins, Ross D. (Ross Daniel)
Other Authors: Olivier L. de Weck.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103563
_version_ 1826195877651283968
author Collins, Ross D. (Ross Daniel)
author2 Olivier L. de Weck.
author_facet Olivier L. de Weck.
Collins, Ross D. (Ross Daniel)
author_sort Collins, Ross D. (Ross Daniel)
collection MIT
description Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, 2015.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:16:37Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/103563
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:16:37Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1035632019-04-12T16:27:57Z Using inclusive wealth as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation Using IW as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation Collins, Ross D. (Ross Daniel) Olivier L. de Weck. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society. Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, 2015. Vita. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 227-237). Inclusive wealth (IW) measures the productive base of an economy, which is a linear index of its capital asset stocks. Changes to IW per capita over time track changes to intergenerational human well-being, thus non-declining IW per capita indicates sustainable development. National IW has only been measured retrospectively; this dissertation models and projects IW prospectively, measuring the impact of alternative infrastructure plans on IW. The focus of the work is on electricity planning in oil-exporting countries. Domestic oil consumption in these countries, driven by increasing electricity use, threatens long-term development by reducing the export revenue on which the government and economy depends. First, I develop a system dynamics model that connects electric power capacity expansion with macroeconomic development, tabulating both infrastructure costs and impacts to the capital stocks of IW over time. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is the primary case study. Second, I analyze the capital stock projections generated by the model across a range of scenarios and countries. Under the baseline IW formulation, KSA experiences a negative annual growth rate to inclusive wealth per capita to 2050. However, adjusted formulations allow the possibility of periods of positive growth, and a non-oil sector that is less dependent on the oil sector will shift the IW trajectory upwards. Compared to KSA, Kuwait is likely to experience larger per capita declines in IW. The United Arab Emirates (UAE), on the other hand, will potentially experience positive growth rates in per capita IW starting in 2028. Third, I analyze the IW impacts of non-fossil investments in electricity infrastructure, specifically nuclear and solar, between now and 2050. In KSA, the produced capital benefits of non-fossil investment outweigh the oil capital costs (to finance the infrastructure) across a range of uncertainties. Including human capital benefits raises net benefits by an order of magnitude. The optimal allocation of nuclear and solar power ultimately depends on the evaluation metric used. The UAE gains least from non-fossil investment, since it uses comparatively less oil in its electricity system, while Kuwait experiences gains similar to KSA. Importantly, using IW as the basis for electricity policy evaluation yields qualitatively different prescriptions than a least-cost capacity expansion model. by Ross D. Collins. Ph. D. 2016-07-11T14:43:31Z 2016-07-11T14:43:31Z 2015 2015 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103563 938609318 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 290 pages application/pdf a-su--- a-ts--- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Institute for Data, Systems, and Society.
Collins, Ross D. (Ross Daniel)
Using inclusive wealth as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation
title Using inclusive wealth as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation
title_full Using inclusive wealth as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation
title_fullStr Using inclusive wealth as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Using inclusive wealth as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation
title_short Using inclusive wealth as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation
title_sort using inclusive wealth as a measure of sustainability for infrastructure planning and evaluation
topic Institute for Data, Systems, and Society.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103563
work_keys_str_mv AT collinsrossdrossdaniel usinginclusivewealthasameasureofsustainabilityforinfrastructureplanningandevaluation
AT collinsrossdrossdaniel usingiwasameasureofsustainabilityforinfrastructureplanningandevaluation