Uncertainty in Future Agro-Climate Projections in the United States and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
Scientific challenges exist on how to extract information from the wide range of projected impacts simulated by crop models driven by climate ensembles. A stronger focus is required to understand and identify the mechanisms and drivers of projected changes in crop yield. In this study, we investigat...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working Paper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
2016
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103777 |
| _version_ | 1811084984069390336 |
|---|---|
| author | Monier, E. Xu, L. Snyder, R. |
| author_facet | Monier, E. Xu, L. Snyder, R. |
| author_sort | Monier, E. |
| collection | MIT |
| description | Scientific challenges exist on how to extract information from the wide range of projected impacts simulated by crop models driven by climate ensembles. A stronger focus is required to understand and identify the mechanisms and drivers of projected changes in crop yield. In this study, we investigate the robustness of future projections of five metrics relevant to agriculture stakeholders (accumulated frost days, dry days, growing season length, plant heat stress and start of field operations). We use a large ensemble of climate simulations by the MIT IGSM-CAM integrated assessment model that accounts for the uncertainty associated with different emissions scenarios, climate sensitivity, and natural variability. By end of century, the US is projected to experience fewer frosts, a longer growing season, more heat stress and an earlier start of field operations—although the magnitude and even the sign of these changes vary greatly by regions. Projected changes in dry days are shown not to be robust. We highlight the important role of natural variability, in particular for changes in dry days (a precipitation-related index) and heat stress (a threshold index). The wide range of our projections compares well the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble, especially for temperature-related indices. This suggests that using a single climate model that accounts for key sources of uncertainty can provide an efficient and complementary framework to the more common approach of multi-model ensembles. We also show that greenhouse gas mitigation has the potential to significantly reduce adverse effects (heat stress, risks of pest and disease) of climate change on agriculture, while also curtailing potentially beneficial impacts (earlier planting, possibility for multiple cropping). A major benefit of climate mitigation is potentially preventing changes in several indices to emerge from the noise of natural variability, even by 2100. This has major implications considering that any significant climate change impacts on crop yield would result in nation-wide changes in the agriculture sector. Finally, we argue that the analysis of agro-climate indices should more often complement crop model projections, as they can provide valuable information to better understand the drivers of changes in crop yield and production and thus better inform adaptation decisions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T13:01:08Z |
| format | Working Paper |
| id | mit-1721.1/103777 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T13:01:08Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/1037772019-04-12T12:16:18Z Uncertainty in Future Agro-Climate Projections in the United States and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Monier, E. Xu, L. Snyder, R. Scientific challenges exist on how to extract information from the wide range of projected impacts simulated by crop models driven by climate ensembles. A stronger focus is required to understand and identify the mechanisms and drivers of projected changes in crop yield. In this study, we investigate the robustness of future projections of five metrics relevant to agriculture stakeholders (accumulated frost days, dry days, growing season length, plant heat stress and start of field operations). We use a large ensemble of climate simulations by the MIT IGSM-CAM integrated assessment model that accounts for the uncertainty associated with different emissions scenarios, climate sensitivity, and natural variability. By end of century, the US is projected to experience fewer frosts, a longer growing season, more heat stress and an earlier start of field operations—although the magnitude and even the sign of these changes vary greatly by regions. Projected changes in dry days are shown not to be robust. We highlight the important role of natural variability, in particular for changes in dry days (a precipitation-related index) and heat stress (a threshold index). The wide range of our projections compares well the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble, especially for temperature-related indices. This suggests that using a single climate model that accounts for key sources of uncertainty can provide an efficient and complementary framework to the more common approach of multi-model ensembles. We also show that greenhouse gas mitigation has the potential to significantly reduce adverse effects (heat stress, risks of pest and disease) of climate change on agriculture, while also curtailing potentially beneficial impacts (earlier planting, possibility for multiple cropping). A major benefit of climate mitigation is potentially preventing changes in several indices to emerge from the noise of natural variability, even by 2100. This has major implications considering that any significant climate change impacts on crop yield would result in nation-wide changes in the agriculture sector. Finally, we argue that the analysis of agro-climate indices should more often complement crop model projections, as they can provide valuable information to better understand the drivers of changes in crop yield and production and thus better inform adaptation decisions. This work was partially funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Climate Change Division, under Cooperative Agreement #XA-83600001, by the US Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, under grant DE-FG02-94ER61937, and by the National Science Foundation Macrosystems Biology Program Grant #EF1137306. The Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change is funded by a number of federal agencies and a consortium of 40 industrial and foundation sponsors. (For the complete list see http://globalchange.mit.edu/sponsors/current.html). This research used the Evergreen computing cluster at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Evergreen is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC05-76RL01830. 2016-07-20T17:35:06Z 2016-07-20T17:35:06Z 2016-03 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103777 Report 293 en MIT Joint Program Report Series;293 application/pdf MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change |
| spellingShingle | Monier, E. Xu, L. Snyder, R. Uncertainty in Future Agro-Climate Projections in the United States and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation |
| title | Uncertainty in Future Agro-Climate Projections in the United States and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation |
| title_full | Uncertainty in Future Agro-Climate Projections in the United States and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation |
| title_fullStr | Uncertainty in Future Agro-Climate Projections in the United States and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Uncertainty in Future Agro-Climate Projections in the United States and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation |
| title_short | Uncertainty in Future Agro-Climate Projections in the United States and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation |
| title_sort | uncertainty in future agro climate projections in the united states and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103777 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT moniere uncertaintyinfutureagroclimateprojectionsintheunitedstatesandbenefitsofgreenhousegasmitigation AT xul uncertaintyinfutureagroclimateprojectionsintheunitedstatesandbenefitsofgreenhousegasmitigation AT snyderr uncertaintyinfutureagroclimateprojectionsintheunitedstatesandbenefitsofgreenhousegasmitigation |