Banana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVP

Pictured objects and scenes can be understood in a brief glimpse, but there is a debate about whether they are first encoded at the basic level (e.g., banana), as proposed by Rosch et al. (1976, Cognitive Psychology) , or at a superordinate level (e.g., fruit). The level at which we first categorize...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Potter, Mary C., Hagmann, Carl Erick
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer US 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103808
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5781-756X
_version_ 1811081000028995584
author Potter, Mary C.
Hagmann, Carl Erick
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Potter, Mary C.
Hagmann, Carl Erick
author_sort Potter, Mary C.
collection MIT
description Pictured objects and scenes can be understood in a brief glimpse, but there is a debate about whether they are first encoded at the basic level (e.g., banana), as proposed by Rosch et al. (1976, Cognitive Psychology) , or at a superordinate level (e.g., fruit). The level at which we first categorize an object matters in everyday situations because it determines whether we approach, avoid, or ignore the object. In the present study, we limited stimulus duration in order to explore the earliest level of object understanding. Target objects were presented among five other pictures using RSVP at 80, 53, 27, or 13 ms/picture. On each trial, participants viewed or heard 1 of 28 superordinate names or a corresponding basic-level name of the target. The name appeared before or after the picture sequence. Detection (as d′) improved as duration increased but was significantly above chance in all conditions and for all durations. When the name was given before the sequence, d′ was higher for the basic than for the superordinate name, showing that specific advance information facilitated visual encoding. In the name-after group, performance on the two category levels did not differ significantly; this suggests that encoding had occurred at the basic level during presentation, allowing the superordinate category to be inferred. We interpret the results as being consistent with the claim that the basic level is usually the entry level for object perception.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:40:12Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/103808
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:40:12Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1038082022-10-01T05:10:14Z Banana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVP Potter, Mary C. Hagmann, Carl Erick Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Potter, Mary C. Hagmann, Carl Erick Pictured objects and scenes can be understood in a brief glimpse, but there is a debate about whether they are first encoded at the basic level (e.g., banana), as proposed by Rosch et al. (1976, Cognitive Psychology) , or at a superordinate level (e.g., fruit). The level at which we first categorize an object matters in everyday situations because it determines whether we approach, avoid, or ignore the object. In the present study, we limited stimulus duration in order to explore the earliest level of object understanding. Target objects were presented among five other pictures using RSVP at 80, 53, 27, or 13 ms/picture. On each trial, participants viewed or heard 1 of 28 superordinate names or a corresponding basic-level name of the target. The name appeared before or after the picture sequence. Detection (as d′) improved as duration increased but was significantly above chance in all conditions and for all durations. When the name was given before the sequence, d′ was higher for the basic than for the superordinate name, showing that specific advance information facilitated visual encoding. In the name-after group, performance on the two category levels did not differ significantly; this suggests that encoding had occurred at the basic level during presentation, allowing the superordinate category to be inferred. We interpret the results as being consistent with the claim that the basic level is usually the entry level for object perception. National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant MH47432) 2016-07-29T19:43:45Z 2016-07-29T19:43:45Z 2014-07 2016-05-23T12:18:07Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1069-9384 1531-5320 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103808 Potter, Mary C., and Carl Erick Hagmann. “Banana or Fruit? Detection and Recognition Across Categorical Levels in RSVP.” Psychon Bull Rev 22, no. 2 (July 24, 2014): 578–585. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5781-756X en http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0692-4 Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Psychonomic Society, Inc. application/pdf Springer US Springer US
spellingShingle Potter, Mary C.
Hagmann, Carl Erick
Banana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVP
title Banana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVP
title_full Banana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVP
title_fullStr Banana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVP
title_full_unstemmed Banana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVP
title_short Banana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVP
title_sort banana or fruit detection and recognition across categorical levels in rsvp
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103808
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5781-756X
work_keys_str_mv AT pottermaryc bananaorfruitdetectionandrecognitionacrosscategoricallevelsinrsvp
AT hagmanncarlerick bananaorfruitdetectionandrecognitionacrosscategoricallevelsinrsvp