Do learning rates adapt to the distribution of rewards?
Studies of reinforcement learning have shown that humans learn differently in response to positive and negative reward prediction errors, a phenomenon that can be captured computationally by positing asymmetric learning rates. This asymmetry, motivated by neurobiological and cognitive considerations...
Main Author: | Gershman, Samuel J. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer US
2016
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103813 |
Similar Items
-
Dopamine Ramps Are a Consequence of Reward Prediction Errors
by: Gershman, Samuel J.
Published: (2014) -
Risk sensitivity for amounts of and delay to rewards: Adaptation for uncertainty or by-product of reward rate maximising?
by: Shapiro, MS, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Risk sensitivity for amounts of and delay to rewards: adaptation for uncertainty or by-product of reward rate maximising?
by: Shapiro, MS, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Do humans produce the speed-accuracy trade-off that maximizes reward rate?
by: Bogacz, R, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Where do hypotheses come from?
by: Dasgupta, Ishita, et al.
Published: (2016)