Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games

In the reputation literature, players have commitment types, which represent the possibility that they do not have standard payoffs, but instead are constrained to follow a particular plan. In this paper, we show that arbitrary commitment types can emerge from incomplete information about the stage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weinstein, Jonathan, Yildiz, Muhamet
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: John Wiley & Sons 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104059
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7637-7117
_version_ 1811096848061956096
author Weinstein, Jonathan
Yildiz, Muhamet
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Weinstein, Jonathan
Yildiz, Muhamet
author_sort Weinstein, Jonathan
collection MIT
description In the reputation literature, players have commitment types, which represent the possibility that they do not have standard payoffs, but instead are constrained to follow a particular plan. In this paper, we show that arbitrary commitment types can emerge from incomplete information about the stage payoffs. In particular, any finitely repeated game with commitment types is strategically equivalent to a standard finitely repeated game with incomplete information about the stage payoffs. Then classic reputation results can be achieved with uncertainty concerning only the stage payoffs.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:49:39Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/104059
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:49:39Z
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley & Sons
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1040592022-10-03T08:36:30Z Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games Weinstein, Jonathan Yildiz, Muhamet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Yildiz, Muhamet In the reputation literature, players have commitment types, which represent the possibility that they do not have standard payoffs, but instead are constrained to follow a particular plan. In this paper, we show that arbitrary commitment types can emerge from incomplete information about the stage payoffs. In particular, any finitely repeated game with commitment types is strategically equivalent to a standard finitely repeated game with incomplete information about the stage payoffs. Then classic reputation results can be achieved with uncertainty concerning only the stage payoffs. 2016-08-29T16:18:47Z 2016-08-29T16:18:47Z 2016-01 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 19336837 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104059 Weinstein, Jonathan, and Muhamet Yildiz. "Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games." Theoretical Economics 11 (2016), 157-185. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7637-7117 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.3982/TE1893 Theoretical Economics Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ application/pdf John Wiley & Sons Society for Economic Theory
spellingShingle Weinstein, Jonathan
Yildiz, Muhamet
Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games
title Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games
title_full Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games
title_fullStr Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games
title_full_unstemmed Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games
title_short Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games
title_sort reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104059
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7637-7117
work_keys_str_mv AT weinsteinjonathan reputationwithoutcommitmentinfinitelyrepeatedgames
AT yildizmuhamet reputationwithoutcommitmentinfinitelyrepeatedgames