Substance and Change in Congressional Ideology: NOMINATE and Its Alternatives
Poole and Rosenthal’s NOMINATE scores have been a boon to the study of Congress, but they are not without limitations. We focus on two limitations that are especially important in historical applications. First, the dimensions uncovered by NOMINATE do not necessarily have a consistent “ideological”...
Main Authors: | Schickler, Eric, Caughey, Devin |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105926 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6769-1438 |
Similar Items
-
The language of politics: ideological differences in congressional communication on social media and the floor of Congress
by: John T. Jost, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Policy and Performance in the New Deal Realignment: Evidence from Old Data and New Methods
by: Caughey, Devin, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Congressional lettermarks, ideology, and member receipt of stimulus awards from the US Department of Labor
by: Jacob R. Neiheisel, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Bibliography of congressional geology /
by: 175831 Pestana, Harold R.
Published: (1972) -
Patterns of congressional voting
by: Poole, Keith T., et al.
Published: (2011)