Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors
Why is it that behaviors that rely on control, so striking in their diversity and flexibility, are also subject to such striking limitations? Typically, people cannot engage in more than a few—and usually only a single—control-demanding task at a time. This limitation was a defining element in the e...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer US
2016
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106139 |
_version_ | 1826200872340684800 |
---|---|
author | Schwemmer, M. Feng, S. F. Cohen, J. D. Gershman, Samuel J |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Schwemmer, M. Feng, S. F. Cohen, J. D. Gershman, Samuel J |
author_sort | Schwemmer, M. |
collection | MIT |
description | Why is it that behaviors that rely on control, so striking in their diversity and flexibility, are also subject to such striking limitations? Typically, people cannot engage in more than a few—and usually only a single—control-demanding task at a time. This limitation was a defining element in the earliest conceptualizations of controlled processing; it remains one of the most widely accepted axioms of cognitive psychology, and is even the basis for some laws (e.g., against the use of mobile devices while driving). Remarkably, however, the source of this limitation is still not understood. Here, we examine one potential source of this limitation, in terms of a trade-off between the flexibility and efficiency of representation (“multiplexing”) and the simultaneous engagement of different processing pathways (“multitasking”). We show that even a modest amount of multiplexing rapidly introduces cross-talk among processing pathways, thereby constraining the number that can be productively engaged at once. We propose that, given the large number of advantages of efficient coding, the human brain has favored this over the capacity for multitasking of control-demanding processes. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:42:45Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/106139 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:42:45Z |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1061392022-09-27T21:26:14Z Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors Schwemmer, M. Feng, S. F. Cohen, J. D. Gershman, Samuel J Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Gershman, Samuel J Why is it that behaviors that rely on control, so striking in their diversity and flexibility, are also subject to such striking limitations? Typically, people cannot engage in more than a few—and usually only a single—control-demanding task at a time. This limitation was a defining element in the earliest conceptualizations of controlled processing; it remains one of the most widely accepted axioms of cognitive psychology, and is even the basis for some laws (e.g., against the use of mobile devices while driving). Remarkably, however, the source of this limitation is still not understood. Here, we examine one potential source of this limitation, in terms of a trade-off between the flexibility and efficiency of representation (“multiplexing”) and the simultaneous engagement of different processing pathways (“multitasking”). We show that even a modest amount of multiplexing rapidly introduces cross-talk among processing pathways, thereby constraining the number that can be productively engaged at once. We propose that, given the large number of advantages of efficient coding, the human brain has favored this over the capacity for multitasking of control-demanding processes. National Science Foundation (U.S.). Graduate Research Fellowship Program 2016-12-27T15:00:47Z 2016-12-27T15:00:47Z 2014-01 2016-08-18T15:46:46Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1530-7026 1531-135X http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106139 Feng, S. F. et al. “Multitasking versus Multiplexing: Toward a Normative Account of Limitations in the Simultaneous Execution of Control-Demanding Behaviors.” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 14.1 (2014): 129–146. en http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0236-9 Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Psychonomic Society, Inc. application/pdf Springer US Springer US |
spellingShingle | Schwemmer, M. Feng, S. F. Cohen, J. D. Gershman, Samuel J Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors |
title | Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors |
title_full | Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors |
title_fullStr | Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors |
title_full_unstemmed | Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors |
title_short | Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors |
title_sort | multitasking versus multiplexing toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control demanding behaviors |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwemmerm multitaskingversusmultiplexingtowardanormativeaccountoflimitationsinthesimultaneousexecutionofcontroldemandingbehaviors AT fengsf multitaskingversusmultiplexingtowardanormativeaccountoflimitationsinthesimultaneousexecutionofcontroldemandingbehaviors AT cohenjd multitaskingversusmultiplexingtowardanormativeaccountoflimitationsinthesimultaneousexecutionofcontroldemandingbehaviors AT gershmansamuelj multitaskingversusmultiplexingtowardanormativeaccountoflimitationsinthesimultaneousexecutionofcontroldemandingbehaviors |