In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Fifty years ago, a short book appeared under the intriguing title The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Its author, Thomas Kuhn (1922–1996), had begun his academic life as a physicist but had migrated to the history and philosophy of science. His main argument in the book — his second work, follo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kaiser, David I.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106157
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-6744
_version_ 1811089398649847808
author Kaiser, David I.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society
Kaiser, David I.
author_sort Kaiser, David I.
collection MIT
description Fifty years ago, a short book appeared under the intriguing title The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Its author, Thomas Kuhn (1922–1996), had begun his academic life as a physicist but had migrated to the history and philosophy of science. His main argument in the book — his second work, following a study of the Copernican revolution in astronomy — was that scientific activity unfolds according to a repeating pattern, which we can discern by studying its history.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:18:33Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/106157
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:18:33Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1061572022-09-29T08:35:42Z In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Kaiser, David I. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society Kaiser, David I. Kaiser, David I. Fifty years ago, a short book appeared under the intriguing title The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Its author, Thomas Kuhn (1922–1996), had begun his academic life as a physicist but had migrated to the history and philosophy of science. His main argument in the book — his second work, following a study of the Copernican revolution in astronomy — was that scientific activity unfolds according to a repeating pattern, which we can discern by studying its history. 2016-12-28T15:08:43Z 2016-12-28T15:08:43Z 2012-04 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1744-7933 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106157 Kaiser, David. "In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." Nature 484 (2012), 164–166. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-6744 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/484164a Nature Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Nature Publishing Group Prof. Kaiser via Michelle Baildon
spellingShingle Kaiser, David I.
In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
title In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
title_full In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
title_fullStr In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
title_full_unstemmed In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
title_short In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
title_sort in retrospect the structure of scientific revolutions
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106157
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-6744
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiserdavidi inretrospectthestructureofscientificrevolutions