Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination

Conventional low temperature thermal desalination (LTTD) uses ocean thermal temperature gradients to drive a single stage flash distillation process to produce pure water from seawater. While the temperature difference in the ocean drives distillation and provides cooling in LTTD, external electrica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nayar, Kishor Govind, Swaminathan, Jaichander, Warsinger, David Elan Martin, Lienhard, John H.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: India Water Week 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107016
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-1057
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-2694
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1473
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-0638
_version_ 1826214601583230976
author Nayar, Kishor Govind
Swaminathan, Jaichander
Warsinger, David Elan Martin
Lienhard, John H.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
Nayar, Kishor Govind
Swaminathan, Jaichander
Warsinger, David Elan Martin
Lienhard, John H.
author_sort Nayar, Kishor Govind
collection MIT
description Conventional low temperature thermal desalination (LTTD) uses ocean thermal temperature gradients to drive a single stage flash distillation process to produce pure water from seawater. While the temperature difference in the ocean drives distillation and provides cooling in LTTD, external electrical energy is required to pump the water streams from the ocean and to maintain a near vacuum in the flash chamber. In this work, an LTTD process from the literature is compared against, the thermodynamic least work and the minimum least work possible for the system, reverse osmosis (RO) and membrane distillation (MD), an alternative thermal desalination technology. In all cases compared, the product water flow rates, feed seawater inlet temperatures and cold seawater inlet conditions were held constant. Exergy and Second law analysis showed that for the LTTD system studied, under reversible operating conditions with no heat exchange with the atmosphere, a power production of 26 kWh/m3 of product water was possible. At near zero recoveries (infinite warm feed flow rates) or allowing heat exchange with an infinite ambient at the warm water temperature, maximum power production possible was found to increase to 75 kWh/m3. In contrast, the LTTD system in literature was found to consume 22 kWh/m3 while standard seawater RO consumes 2.3 kWh/m3. MD was found to be an effective alternative LTTD technology. Switching to MD from flash distillation eliminates the need for vacuum pumps and also reduces the pumping power consumption by reducing both the required cool and warm water flow rates through increased recovery ratios. Furthermore, pressure drops in the condenser on the cool side and the requirement of pumping brine back to atmospheric pressure from a near vacuum in a conventional LTTD flash chamber are avoided. The proposed LTMD system can potentially perform competitively with RO by operating with a specific power consumption less than 2.5 kWh/m3, while retaining the environmental benefits of the conventional LTTD system.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:08:05Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/107016
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:08:05Z
publishDate 2017
publisher India Water Week
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1070162022-10-02T06:36:04Z Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination Nayar, Kishor Govind Swaminathan, Jaichander Warsinger, David Elan Martin Lienhard, John H. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering Nayar, Kishor Govind Swaminathan, Jaichander Warsinger, David Elan Martin Lienhard, John H. Conventional low temperature thermal desalination (LTTD) uses ocean thermal temperature gradients to drive a single stage flash distillation process to produce pure water from seawater. While the temperature difference in the ocean drives distillation and provides cooling in LTTD, external electrical energy is required to pump the water streams from the ocean and to maintain a near vacuum in the flash chamber. In this work, an LTTD process from the literature is compared against, the thermodynamic least work and the minimum least work possible for the system, reverse osmosis (RO) and membrane distillation (MD), an alternative thermal desalination technology. In all cases compared, the product water flow rates, feed seawater inlet temperatures and cold seawater inlet conditions were held constant. Exergy and Second law analysis showed that for the LTTD system studied, under reversible operating conditions with no heat exchange with the atmosphere, a power production of 26 kWh/m3 of product water was possible. At near zero recoveries (infinite warm feed flow rates) or allowing heat exchange with an infinite ambient at the warm water temperature, maximum power production possible was found to increase to 75 kWh/m3. In contrast, the LTTD system in literature was found to consume 22 kWh/m3 while standard seawater RO consumes 2.3 kWh/m3. MD was found to be an effective alternative LTTD technology. Switching to MD from flash distillation eliminates the need for vacuum pumps and also reduces the pumping power consumption by reducing both the required cool and warm water flow rates through increased recovery ratios. Furthermore, pressure drops in the condenser on the cool side and the requirement of pumping brine back to atmospheric pressure from a near vacuum in a conventional LTTD flash chamber are avoided. The proposed LTMD system can potentially perform competitively with RO by operating with a specific power consumption less than 2.5 kWh/m3, while retaining the environmental benefits of the conventional LTTD system. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM (Project No. R13-CW-10)) MIT & Masdar Institute Cooperative Program (Reference No. 02/MI/MI/CP/11/07633/GEN/G/00) 2017-02-22T15:41:02Z 2017-02-22T15:41:02Z 2015-03 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107016 K. G. Nayar, J. Swaminathan, D. M. Warsinger, and J. H. Lienhard V, “Performance Limits and Opportunities for low temperature thermal desalination,” in Proceedings of the 2015 Indian Water Week, New Delhi, India, Jan. 2015. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-1057 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-2694 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1473 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-0638 en_US http://www.indiawaterweek.in/download_2015.aspx Proceedings of the 2015 Indian Water Week Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf India Water Week Prof. Lienhard via Angie Locknar
spellingShingle Nayar, Kishor Govind
Swaminathan, Jaichander
Warsinger, David Elan Martin
Lienhard, John H.
Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination
title Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination
title_full Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination
title_fullStr Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination
title_full_unstemmed Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination
title_short Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination
title_sort performance limits and opportunities for low temperature thermal desalination
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107016
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-1057
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-2694
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1473
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-0638
work_keys_str_mv AT nayarkishorgovind performancelimitsandopportunitiesforlowtemperaturethermaldesalination
AT swaminathanjaichander performancelimitsandopportunitiesforlowtemperaturethermaldesalination
AT warsingerdavidelanmartin performancelimitsandopportunitiesforlowtemperaturethermaldesalination
AT lienhardjohnh performancelimitsandopportunitiesforlowtemperaturethermaldesalination