Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination
Conventional low temperature thermal desalination (LTTD) uses ocean thermal temperature gradients to drive a single stage flash distillation process to produce pure water from seawater. While the temperature difference in the ocean drives distillation and provides cooling in LTTD, external electrica...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
India Water Week
2017
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107016 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-1057 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-2694 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1473 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-0638 |
_version_ | 1826214601583230976 |
---|---|
author | Nayar, Kishor Govind Swaminathan, Jaichander Warsinger, David Elan Martin Lienhard, John H. |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering Nayar, Kishor Govind Swaminathan, Jaichander Warsinger, David Elan Martin Lienhard, John H. |
author_sort | Nayar, Kishor Govind |
collection | MIT |
description | Conventional low temperature thermal desalination (LTTD) uses ocean thermal temperature gradients to drive a single stage flash distillation process to produce pure water from seawater. While the temperature difference in the ocean drives distillation and provides cooling in LTTD, external electrical energy is required to pump the water streams from the ocean and to maintain a near vacuum in the flash chamber. In this work, an LTTD process from the literature is compared against, the thermodynamic least work and the minimum least work possible for the system, reverse osmosis (RO) and membrane distillation (MD), an alternative thermal desalination technology. In all cases compared, the product water flow rates, feed seawater inlet temperatures and cold seawater inlet conditions were held constant. Exergy and Second law analysis showed that for the LTTD system studied, under reversible operating conditions with no heat exchange with the atmosphere, a power production of 26 kWh/m3 of product water was possible. At near zero recoveries (infinite warm feed flow rates) or allowing heat exchange with an infinite ambient at the warm water temperature, maximum power production possible was found to increase to 75 kWh/m3. In contrast, the LTTD system in literature was found to consume 22 kWh/m3 while standard seawater RO consumes 2.3 kWh/m3. MD was found to be an effective alternative LTTD technology. Switching to MD from flash distillation eliminates the need for vacuum pumps and also reduces the pumping power consumption by reducing both the required cool and warm water flow rates through increased recovery ratios. Furthermore, pressure drops in the condenser on the cool side and the requirement of pumping brine back to atmospheric pressure from a near vacuum in a conventional LTTD flash chamber are avoided. The proposed LTMD system can potentially perform competitively with RO by operating with a specific power consumption less than 2.5 kWh/m3, while retaining the environmental benefits of the conventional LTTD system. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T16:08:05Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/107016 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | en_US |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T16:08:05Z |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | India Water Week |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1070162022-10-02T06:36:04Z Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination Nayar, Kishor Govind Swaminathan, Jaichander Warsinger, David Elan Martin Lienhard, John H. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering Nayar, Kishor Govind Swaminathan, Jaichander Warsinger, David Elan Martin Lienhard, John H. Conventional low temperature thermal desalination (LTTD) uses ocean thermal temperature gradients to drive a single stage flash distillation process to produce pure water from seawater. While the temperature difference in the ocean drives distillation and provides cooling in LTTD, external electrical energy is required to pump the water streams from the ocean and to maintain a near vacuum in the flash chamber. In this work, an LTTD process from the literature is compared against, the thermodynamic least work and the minimum least work possible for the system, reverse osmosis (RO) and membrane distillation (MD), an alternative thermal desalination technology. In all cases compared, the product water flow rates, feed seawater inlet temperatures and cold seawater inlet conditions were held constant. Exergy and Second law analysis showed that for the LTTD system studied, under reversible operating conditions with no heat exchange with the atmosphere, a power production of 26 kWh/m3 of product water was possible. At near zero recoveries (infinite warm feed flow rates) or allowing heat exchange with an infinite ambient at the warm water temperature, maximum power production possible was found to increase to 75 kWh/m3. In contrast, the LTTD system in literature was found to consume 22 kWh/m3 while standard seawater RO consumes 2.3 kWh/m3. MD was found to be an effective alternative LTTD technology. Switching to MD from flash distillation eliminates the need for vacuum pumps and also reduces the pumping power consumption by reducing both the required cool and warm water flow rates through increased recovery ratios. Furthermore, pressure drops in the condenser on the cool side and the requirement of pumping brine back to atmospheric pressure from a near vacuum in a conventional LTTD flash chamber are avoided. The proposed LTMD system can potentially perform competitively with RO by operating with a specific power consumption less than 2.5 kWh/m3, while retaining the environmental benefits of the conventional LTTD system. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM (Project No. R13-CW-10)) MIT & Masdar Institute Cooperative Program (Reference No. 02/MI/MI/CP/11/07633/GEN/G/00) 2017-02-22T15:41:02Z 2017-02-22T15:41:02Z 2015-03 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107016 K. G. Nayar, J. Swaminathan, D. M. Warsinger, and J. H. Lienhard V, “Performance Limits and Opportunities for low temperature thermal desalination,” in Proceedings of the 2015 Indian Water Week, New Delhi, India, Jan. 2015. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-1057 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-2694 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1473 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-0638 en_US http://www.indiawaterweek.in/download_2015.aspx Proceedings of the 2015 Indian Water Week Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf India Water Week Prof. Lienhard via Angie Locknar |
spellingShingle | Nayar, Kishor Govind Swaminathan, Jaichander Warsinger, David Elan Martin Lienhard, John H. Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination |
title | Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination |
title_full | Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination |
title_fullStr | Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination |
title_short | Performance Limits and Opportunities for Low Temperature Thermal Desalination |
title_sort | performance limits and opportunities for low temperature thermal desalination |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107016 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0988-1057 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-2694 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1473 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-0638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nayarkishorgovind performancelimitsandopportunitiesforlowtemperaturethermaldesalination AT swaminathanjaichander performancelimitsandopportunitiesforlowtemperaturethermaldesalination AT warsingerdavidelanmartin performancelimitsandopportunitiesforlowtemperaturethermaldesalination AT lienhardjohnh performancelimitsandopportunitiesforlowtemperaturethermaldesalination |