Epistemic stability

Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2016.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Das, Nilanjan, Ph. D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Other Authors: Roger White.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107096
_version_ 1826203953335894016
author Das, Nilanjan, Ph. D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
author2 Roger White.
author_facet Roger White.
Das, Nilanjan, Ph. D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
author_sort Das, Nilanjan, Ph. D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection MIT
description Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2016.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T12:46:50Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/107096
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T12:46:50Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1070962019-04-10T13:13:18Z Epistemic stability Das, Nilanjan, Ph. D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Roger White. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. Linguistics and Philosophy. Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2016. "September 2016." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 119-134). I argue that knowledge and rational belief are subject to stability conditions. A belief that amounts to knowledge couldn't easily have been lost due to the impact of misleading evidence. A belief that is rational couldn't easily have been withdrawn upon reflection on its epistemic credentials. In Chapter 1, I support a picture of epistemic rationality on which a belief, in order to be rational, must be stable under reflection, i.e., it must be capable of surviving reflective scrutiny. To make room for this condition, I defend the possibility of higher-order defeat, where a belief's rationally undermined by misleading higher order evidence, i.e., by evidence about what one's evidence supports. I sketch an account of-higher-order defeat on which higher-order evidence makes an agent's total body of evidence fragmented: even though a piece of evidence is available within the agent's cognitive system, the agent is unable to rationally bring it to bear upon certain questions. In Chapter 2, I explore an analogy between knowledge and moral worth. Just as knowledge requires the agent to non-accidentally believe the truth, so too does morally worthy action require the agent to non-accidentally perform the right action. I argue that the analogy lends support to an explanation-based account of knowledge: a belief amounts to knowledge only if the manner in which the agent forms the belief explains both why the agent holds the belief (rather than losing it) and why she forms a true belief (rather than a false one). I call this view explanationism. In Chapter 3, 1 discuss a consequence of explanationism: a belief that amounts to knowledge couldn't easily be rationally defeated by misleading evidence. This condition-safety from from defeat explains a range of different epistemic phenomena. It accounts for the explanatory role of knowledge in relation to certain kinds of behaviour, like rational perseverance. It obviates certain demanding "internalist" conditions on knowledge. It also illuminates the connection between knowledge and practical interests. by Nilanjan Das. Ph. D. 2017-02-22T19:03:22Z 2017-02-22T19:03:22Z 2016 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107096 971253987 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 viii, 134 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Linguistics and Philosophy.
Das, Nilanjan, Ph. D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Epistemic stability
title Epistemic stability
title_full Epistemic stability
title_fullStr Epistemic stability
title_full_unstemmed Epistemic stability
title_short Epistemic stability
title_sort epistemic stability
topic Linguistics and Philosophy.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107096
work_keys_str_mv AT dasnilanjanphdmassachusettsinstituteoftechnology epistemicstability