Open knowledge and changing the subject
Knowledge is closed under (known) implication, according to standard theories. Orthodoxy can allow, though, that apparent counterexamples to closure exist, much as Kripkeans recognize the existence of illusions of possibility (IPOs) which they seek to explain away. Should not everyone, orthodox or n...
Main Author: | Yablo, Stephen |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107671 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9486-8323 |
Similar Items
-
Replies to Comments on If-Thenism
by: Yablo, Stephen
Published: (2020) -
Reply to Fine on Aboutness
by: Yablo, Stephen
Published: (2018) -
Parts and differences
by: Yablo, Stephen
Published: (2016) -
Nonexistence and Aboutness: The Bandersnatches of Dubuque
by: Yablo, Stephen
Published: (2021) -
24.03 Relativism, Reason, and Reality, Spring 2005
by: Yablo, Stephen
Published: (2023)