Moral status of accidents

No one is naive enough to expect that all moral beliefs are universal. Today, some countries legally beat and imprison homosexuals, and others recognize gay marriage; in some places, killing a bull is a sport, and, in others, it is an abomination; in some places, corporal punishment is the obligatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saxe, Rebecca R
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107812
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791
_version_ 1826201218938044416
author Saxe, Rebecca R
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Saxe, Rebecca R
author_sort Saxe, Rebecca R
collection MIT
description No one is naive enough to expect that all moral beliefs are universal. Today, some countries legally beat and imprison homosexuals, and others recognize gay marriage; in some places, killing a bull is a sport, and, in others, it is an abomination; in some places, corporal punishment is the obligation of a responsible parent and, in others, grounds for forced removal. Indeed, the burden of proof seems to be on the other side: Is there anything universal about human moral cognition? In PNAS, Barrett et al. (1) test one candidate for a universal principle of human morality: that an action’s moral value depends not only on the action’s consequences but on the person’s intentions.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:48:23Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/107812
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:48:23Z
publishDate 2017
publisher National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1078122022-09-27T22:03:09Z Moral status of accidents Saxe, Rebecca R Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Saxe, Rebecca R No one is naive enough to expect that all moral beliefs are universal. Today, some countries legally beat and imprison homosexuals, and others recognize gay marriage; in some places, killing a bull is a sport, and, in others, it is an abomination; in some places, corporal punishment is the obligation of a responsible parent and, in others, grounds for forced removal. Indeed, the burden of proof seems to be on the other side: Is there anything universal about human moral cognition? In PNAS, Barrett et al. (1) test one candidate for a universal principle of human morality: that an action’s moral value depends not only on the action’s consequences but on the person’s intentions. 2017-03-31T22:56:51Z 2017-03-31T22:56:51Z 2014-04 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0027-8424 1091-6490 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107812 Saxe, Rebecca. “Moral Status of Accidents.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 17 (April 14, 2016): 4555–4557. © 2016 National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604154113 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) PNAS
spellingShingle Saxe, Rebecca R
Moral status of accidents
title Moral status of accidents
title_full Moral status of accidents
title_fullStr Moral status of accidents
title_full_unstemmed Moral status of accidents
title_short Moral status of accidents
title_sort moral status of accidents
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107812
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791
work_keys_str_mv AT saxerebeccar moralstatusofaccidents