Moral status of accidents
No one is naive enough to expect that all moral beliefs are universal. Today, some countries legally beat and imprison homosexuals, and others recognize gay marriage; in some places, killing a bull is a sport, and, in others, it is an abomination; in some places, corporal punishment is the obligatio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
2017
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107812 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791 |
_version_ | 1826201218938044416 |
---|---|
author | Saxe, Rebecca R |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Saxe, Rebecca R |
author_sort | Saxe, Rebecca R |
collection | MIT |
description | No one is naive enough to expect that all moral beliefs are universal. Today, some countries legally beat and imprison homosexuals, and others recognize gay marriage; in some places, killing a bull is a sport, and, in others, it is an abomination; in some places, corporal punishment is the obligation of a responsible parent and, in others, grounds for forced removal. Indeed, the burden of proof seems to be on the other side: Is there anything universal about human moral cognition? In PNAS, Barrett et al. (1) test one candidate for a universal principle of human morality: that an action’s moral value depends not only on the action’s consequences but on the person’s intentions. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:48:23Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/107812 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | en_US |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:48:23Z |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1078122022-09-27T22:03:09Z Moral status of accidents Saxe, Rebecca R Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Saxe, Rebecca R No one is naive enough to expect that all moral beliefs are universal. Today, some countries legally beat and imprison homosexuals, and others recognize gay marriage; in some places, killing a bull is a sport, and, in others, it is an abomination; in some places, corporal punishment is the obligation of a responsible parent and, in others, grounds for forced removal. Indeed, the burden of proof seems to be on the other side: Is there anything universal about human moral cognition? In PNAS, Barrett et al. (1) test one candidate for a universal principle of human morality: that an action’s moral value depends not only on the action’s consequences but on the person’s intentions. 2017-03-31T22:56:51Z 2017-03-31T22:56:51Z 2014-04 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0027-8424 1091-6490 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107812 Saxe, Rebecca. “Moral Status of Accidents.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 17 (April 14, 2016): 4555–4557. © 2016 National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604154113 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) PNAS |
spellingShingle | Saxe, Rebecca R Moral status of accidents |
title | Moral status of accidents |
title_full | Moral status of accidents |
title_fullStr | Moral status of accidents |
title_full_unstemmed | Moral status of accidents |
title_short | Moral status of accidents |
title_sort | moral status of accidents |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/107812 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saxerebeccar moralstatusofaccidents |