Sociomateriality — taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch

In responding to Mutch's (2013) commentary on sociomateriality, our aim is to reassert a well-established tradition of plurality in theoretical approaches in information systems and organization research. We challenge his critique by proxy and exclusionary discourse in favour of identifying com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott, Susan V., Orlikowski, Wanda J
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Elsevier 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108097
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-9466
_version_ 1826212868433903616
author Scott, Susan V.
Orlikowski, Wanda J
author2 Sloan School of Management
author_facet Sloan School of Management
Scott, Susan V.
Orlikowski, Wanda J
author_sort Scott, Susan V.
collection MIT
description In responding to Mutch's (2013) commentary on sociomateriality, our aim is to reassert a well-established tradition of plurality in theoretical approaches in information systems and organization research. We challenge his critique by proxy and exclusionary discourse in favour of identifying commonalities and mutuality among theories that explore subtle realism. Further, we maintain that ruling out novel perspectives and stifling innovation is likely to undermine any field of study. If there is a measure of healthy scholarship then it is surely our capacity to sustain the conditions that foster openness and experimentation in the framing and doing of our research endeavors.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:39:25Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/108097
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:39:25Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1080972022-09-29T15:18:06Z Sociomateriality — taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch Scott, Susan V. Orlikowski, Wanda J Sloan School of Management Orlikowski, Wanda J In responding to Mutch's (2013) commentary on sociomateriality, our aim is to reassert a well-established tradition of plurality in theoretical approaches in information systems and organization research. We challenge his critique by proxy and exclusionary discourse in favour of identifying commonalities and mutuality among theories that explore subtle realism. Further, we maintain that ruling out novel perspectives and stifling innovation is likely to undermine any field of study. If there is a measure of healthy scholarship then it is surely our capacity to sustain the conditions that foster openness and experimentation in the framing and doing of our research endeavors. 2017-04-13T13:40:40Z 2017-04-13T13:40:40Z 2013-03 2013-02 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1471-7727 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108097 Scott, Susan V., and Wanda J. Orlikowski. “Sociomateriality — Taking the Wrong Turning? A Response to Mutch.” Information and Organization 23.2 (2013): 77–80. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-9466 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.003 Information and Organization Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Elsevier Prof. Orlikowski via Alex Caracuzzo
spellingShingle Scott, Susan V.
Orlikowski, Wanda J
Sociomateriality — taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch
title Sociomateriality — taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch
title_full Sociomateriality — taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch
title_fullStr Sociomateriality — taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch
title_full_unstemmed Sociomateriality — taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch
title_short Sociomateriality — taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch
title_sort sociomateriality taking the wrong turning a response to mutch
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108097
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-9466
work_keys_str_mv AT scottsusanv sociomaterialitytakingthewrongturningaresponsetomutch
AT orlikowskiwandaj sociomaterialitytakingthewrongturningaresponsetomutch