Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network

This paper strengthens the basis for a key claim of contemporary economic sociology — that strong ties among capitalists cannot be reduced to rational considerations. Support for this claim has been limited by reliance on an external standard of rationality, whereby irrationality in commitment to a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W, Sgourev, Stoyan
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Sage Publications 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108304
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6271-0708
_version_ 1826193939229573120
author Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W
Sgourev, Stoyan
author2 Sloan School of Management
author_facet Sloan School of Management
Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W
Sgourev, Stoyan
author_sort Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W
collection MIT
description This paper strengthens the basis for a key claim of contemporary economic sociology — that strong ties among capitalists cannot be reduced to rational considerations. Support for this claim has been limited by reliance on an external standard of rationality, whereby irrationality in commitment to a partner or network is based on an observer’s evaluation of an actor’s interests. In this article we address this limitation by developing an internal standard for assessing the rationality of an actor’s commitment, which is derived from Davidson’s (1980) definition of akrasia or ‘incontinence.’ In addition, we clarify the mechanisms that produce ‘akratic’ commitment among capitalists: (a) short-term emotions that overwhelm rational calculation; and (b) a sense of loyalty that leads one to incorporate others’ interests into one’s own. Finally, we provide systematic evidence of akratic commitment and the proposed mechanisms from studies of an industry peer network in the remodeling construction industry.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:47:40Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/108304
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:47:40Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Sage Publications
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1083042022-09-30T16:53:39Z Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W Sgourev, Stoyan Sloan School of Management Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W Sgourev, Stoyan This paper strengthens the basis for a key claim of contemporary economic sociology — that strong ties among capitalists cannot be reduced to rational considerations. Support for this claim has been limited by reliance on an external standard of rationality, whereby irrationality in commitment to a partner or network is based on an observer’s evaluation of an actor’s interests. In this article we address this limitation by developing an internal standard for assessing the rationality of an actor’s commitment, which is derived from Davidson’s (1980) definition of akrasia or ‘incontinence.’ In addition, we clarify the mechanisms that produce ‘akratic’ commitment among capitalists: (a) short-term emotions that overwhelm rational calculation; and (b) a sense of loyalty that leads one to incorporate others’ interests into one’s own. Finally, we provide systematic evidence of akratic commitment and the proposed mechanisms from studies of an industry peer network in the remodeling construction industry. 2017-04-20T18:02:08Z 2017-04-20T18:02:08Z 2011-03 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1043-4631 1461-7358 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108304 Sgourev, S. V. and Zuckerman, E. W. “Breaking up Is Hard to Do: Irrational Inconsistency in Commitment to an Industry Peer Network.” Rationality and Society 23, no. 1 (February 2011): 3–34. © 2011 Sage Publications https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6271-0708 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043463110396444 Rationality and Society Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Sage Publications Prof. Zuckerman via Alex Caracuzzo
spellingShingle Zuckerman Sivan, Ezra W
Sgourev, Stoyan
Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network
title Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network
title_full Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network
title_fullStr Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network
title_full_unstemmed Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network
title_short Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network
title_sort breaking up is hard to do irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108304
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6271-0708
work_keys_str_mv AT zuckermansivanezraw breakingupishardtodoirrationalinconsistencyincommitmenttoanindustrypeernetwork
AT sgourevstoyan breakingupishardtodoirrationalinconsistencyincommitmenttoanindustrypeernetwork