Engineering Models to Scale
Main Text The physicist Richard Feynman famously wrote, “What I cannot create, I do not understand,” at the top of his final blackboard. This philosophy has inspired many in the emerging field of synthetic biology, which harnesses the power of biology to rationally engineer biomolecular systems for...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | en_US |
| Published: |
Elsevier B.V.
2017
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108578 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0319-5416 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5560-8246 |
| Summary: | Main Text
The physicist Richard Feynman famously wrote, “What I cannot create, I do not understand,” at the top of his final blackboard. This philosophy has inspired many in the emerging field of synthetic biology, which harnesses the power of biology to rationally engineer biomolecular systems for a variety of purposes, such as whole-cell biosensing and in vivo diagnostics (Slomovic et al., 2015). The “build-to-understand” approach (Elowitz and Lim, 2010) is complementary to top-down systems biology approaches and borrows concepts and techniques from engineering and computer science. By creating biological systems with desired architectures and functions, it aims to test design principles in relative isolation by exploring how biology’s building blocks, such as DNA-encoded genes, can be rearranged and altered to produce different phenotypes. In this issue, Cao et al. use this approach to tackle the question of how self-organizing systems maintain a constant ratio of physical pattern features with changing size, a property known as scale invariance (Cao et al., 2016). |
|---|