Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities

Most theories of motivation have highlighted that human behavior is guided by the hedonic principle, according to which our choices of daily activities aim to minimize negative affect and maximize positive affect. However, it is not clear how to reconcile this idea with the fact that people routinel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taquet, Maxime, Quoidbach, Jordi, de Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre, Desseilles, Martin, Gross, James J.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108683
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-589X
_version_ 1811073240496340992
author Taquet, Maxime
Quoidbach, Jordi
de Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre
Desseilles, Martin
Gross, James J.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
Taquet, Maxime
Quoidbach, Jordi
de Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre
Desseilles, Martin
Gross, James J.
author_sort Taquet, Maxime
collection MIT
description Most theories of motivation have highlighted that human behavior is guided by the hedonic principle, according to which our choices of daily activities aim to minimize negative affect and maximize positive affect. However, it is not clear how to reconcile this idea with the fact that people routinely engage in unpleasant yet necessary activities. To address this issue, we monitored in real time the activities and moods of over 28,000 people across an average of 27 d using a multiplatform smartphone application. We found that people’s choices of activities followed a hedonic flexibility principle. Specifically, people were more likely to engage in mood-increasing activities (e.g., play sports) when they felt bad, and to engage in useful but mood-decreasing activities (e.g., housework) when they felt good. These findings clarify how hedonic considerations shape human behavior. They may explain how humans overcome the allure of short-term gains in happiness to maximize long-term welfare.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:30:27Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/108683
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:30:27Z
publishDate 2017
publisher National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1086832022-09-30T14:54:55Z Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities Taquet, Maxime Quoidbach, Jordi de Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre Desseilles, Martin Gross, James J. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory de Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre Most theories of motivation have highlighted that human behavior is guided by the hedonic principle, according to which our choices of daily activities aim to minimize negative affect and maximize positive affect. However, it is not clear how to reconcile this idea with the fact that people routinely engage in unpleasant yet necessary activities. To address this issue, we monitored in real time the activities and moods of over 28,000 people across an average of 27 d using a multiplatform smartphone application. We found that people’s choices of activities followed a hedonic flexibility principle. Specifically, people were more likely to engage in mood-increasing activities (e.g., play sports) when they felt bad, and to engage in useful but mood-decreasing activities (e.g., housework) when they felt good. These findings clarify how hedonic considerations shape human behavior. They may explain how humans overcome the allure of short-term gains in happiness to maximize long-term welfare. 2017-05-05T13:18:50Z 2017-05-05T13:18:50Z 2016-08 2015-10 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0027-8424 1091-6490 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108683 Taquet, Maxime; Quoidbach, Jordi; de Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre; Desseilles, Martin and Gross, James J. “Hedonism and the Choice of Everyday Activities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 35 (August 2016): 9769–9773. © 2016 National Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-589X en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519998113 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) PNAS
spellingShingle Taquet, Maxime
Quoidbach, Jordi
de Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre
Desseilles, Martin
Gross, James J.
Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities
title Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities
title_full Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities
title_fullStr Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities
title_full_unstemmed Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities
title_short Hedonism and the choice of everyday activities
title_sort hedonism and the choice of everyday activities
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108683
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-589X
work_keys_str_mv AT taquetmaxime hedonismandthechoiceofeverydayactivities
AT quoidbachjordi hedonismandthechoiceofeverydayactivities
AT demontjoyeyvesalexandre hedonismandthechoiceofeverydayactivities
AT desseillesmartin hedonismandthechoiceofeverydayactivities
AT grossjamesj hedonismandthechoiceofeverydayactivities