Edges and linearization: A reply

This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators – Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller – for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up area...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trinh, Tue Huu
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Walter de Gruyter 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108720
_version_ 1826194732778258432
author Trinh, Tue Huu
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Trinh, Tue Huu
author_sort Trinh, Tue Huu
collection MIT
description This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators – Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller – for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up areas where new predictions can be made and raised questions to be investigated in future research. It is unfortunate that these critiques and this reply did not appear in the same volume. The first section of the reply will hence be a brief summary of my proposal. The theory will be presented in a slightly different way, more transparent than the original formulation but equivalent with it in content. It is my hope that the reformulation will address some of the questions raised in the commentaries. Other issues are discussed in the sections that follow
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:01:16Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/108720
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:01:16Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Walter de Gruyter
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1087202022-09-30T18:21:09Z Edges and linearization: A reply Trinh, Tue Huu Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Trinh, Tue Huu This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators – Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller – for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up areas where new predictions can be made and raised questions to be investigated in future research. It is unfortunate that these critiques and this reply did not appear in the same volume. The first section of the reply will hence be a brief summary of my proposal. The theory will be presented in a slightly different way, more transparent than the original formulation but equivalent with it in content. It is my hope that the reformulation will address some of the questions raised in the commentaries. Other issues are discussed in the sections that follow 2017-05-05T23:38:43Z 2017-05-05T23:38:43Z 2010-10 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0301-4428 1613-4060 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108720 Trinh, Tue. “Edges and Linearization: A Reply.” Theoretical Linguistics 36, no. 1 (January 2010). © 2010 Walter de Gruyte en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/thli.2010.007 Theoretical Linguistics Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Walter de Gruyter Walter de Gruyter
spellingShingle Trinh, Tue Huu
Edges and linearization: A reply
title Edges and linearization: A reply
title_full Edges and linearization: A reply
title_fullStr Edges and linearization: A reply
title_full_unstemmed Edges and linearization: A reply
title_short Edges and linearization: A reply
title_sort edges and linearization a reply
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108720
work_keys_str_mv AT trinhtuehuu edgesandlinearizationareply