Edges and linearization: A reply
This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators – Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller – for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up area...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Walter de Gruyter
2017
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108720 |
_version_ | 1826194732778258432 |
---|---|
author | Trinh, Tue Huu |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Trinh, Tue Huu |
author_sort | Trinh, Tue Huu |
collection | MIT |
description | This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators – Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller – for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up areas where new predictions can be made and raised questions to be investigated in future research. It is unfortunate that these critiques and this reply did not appear in the same volume. The first section of the reply will hence be a brief summary of my proposal. The theory will be presented in a slightly different way, more transparent than the original formulation but equivalent with it in content. It is my hope that the reformulation will address some of the questions raised in the commentaries. Other issues are discussed in the sections that follow |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:01:16Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/108720 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | en_US |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:01:16Z |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Walter de Gruyter |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1087202022-09-30T18:21:09Z Edges and linearization: A reply Trinh, Tue Huu Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Trinh, Tue Huu This is my reply to the commentaries on Trinh (2009). I thank the commentators – Enoch Aboh, Josef Bayer, Nigel Duffield, Roland Hinterhölzl, Anders Holmberg, Shinichiro Ishihara and Gereon Müller – for their helpful critiques, which point out several shortcomings of the target paper, opened up areas where new predictions can be made and raised questions to be investigated in future research. It is unfortunate that these critiques and this reply did not appear in the same volume. The first section of the reply will hence be a brief summary of my proposal. The theory will be presented in a slightly different way, more transparent than the original formulation but equivalent with it in content. It is my hope that the reformulation will address some of the questions raised in the commentaries. Other issues are discussed in the sections that follow 2017-05-05T23:38:43Z 2017-05-05T23:38:43Z 2010-10 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0301-4428 1613-4060 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108720 Trinh, Tue. “Edges and Linearization: A Reply.” Theoretical Linguistics 36, no. 1 (January 2010). © 2010 Walter de Gruyte en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/thli.2010.007 Theoretical Linguistics Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Walter de Gruyter Walter de Gruyter |
spellingShingle | Trinh, Tue Huu Edges and linearization: A reply |
title | Edges and linearization: A reply |
title_full | Edges and linearization: A reply |
title_fullStr | Edges and linearization: A reply |
title_full_unstemmed | Edges and linearization: A reply |
title_short | Edges and linearization: A reply |
title_sort | edges and linearization a reply |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trinhtuehuu edgesandlinearizationareply |