Market imperfections and market-based policy instruments

Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Economics, 2017.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eun, Dong Jae
Other Authors: Glenn Ellison.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109014
_version_ 1811077975991386112
author Eun, Dong Jae
author2 Glenn Ellison.
author_facet Glenn Ellison.
Eun, Dong Jae
author_sort Eun, Dong Jae
collection MIT
description Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Economics, 2017.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:51:25Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/109014
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:51:25Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1090142019-04-11T03:03:31Z Market imperfections and market-based policy instruments Eun, Dong Jae Glenn Ellison. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics. Economics. Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Economics, 2017. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 149-152). The first chapter discusses procurement auction mechanisms under the political constraint that the contractor is in effect protected from ex-post loss. Many construction procurers who use first price auctions eliminate abnormally low bids in order to reduce the probability of ex-post bid adjustment. The Korean government systematizes such a bid screening process by setting a stochastic cutoff under which bids are disregarded. This chapter builds an auction model with ex-post bid adjustment and establishes that introducing a stochastic cutoff indeed decreases the probability of ex-post bid adjustment when the contractor is protected from ex-post loss. Data on Korean public procurement auctions for paving work is used to structurally estimate model parameters and assess welfare implications. Counterfactual analyses indicate that, if the Korean government were to switch to the usual first price auction, (1) the probability of bid adjustments triggered by cost overruns would significantly increase, from 14 percent to 88 percent; (2) the resulting social cost increase due to bid adjustment processes would amount to at least 360 percent of cost savings from the first price auction's ability to find an efficient firm; and therefore (3) the total social cost increase would be 7 percent. Finally, a mechanism design approach is employed to characterize an optimal mechanism under a no loss constraint and to provide a measure of efficiency loss associated with the two forms of auctions. The second chapter quantifies consumers' cognitive costs in the context of fast-food purchases. Most fast-food burger chains set different effective add-on (fries and a soda) prices in "meals" across burger items. This means that sophisticated consumers, who buy, for example, a sandwich-only and a meal, may try rearranging the add-ons across burgers in hopes of lowering their payment. This feature provides a unique opportunity to study consumers' behavior, when a firm engages in price obfuscation-charging multiple prices for an identical product and requiring consumers to incur cognitive costs before finding lowest price quotes. Using sales data of a Korean local fast-food chain, this chapter first presents descriptive evidence that consumers do respond to an opportunity to lower expenses by rearranging add-on items. Then it develops and estimates an optimal model of calculation and rearrangement where a consumer incurs a unit of cognitive cost for every effective add-on price of a burger she calculates. The third chapter documents how a persistent adverse selection problem can be eventually mitigated by market force. In 2010, a prominent conglomerate entered as a market-maker in the Korean online used car market, which had long been considered a "market for lemons". In order to alleviate the asymmetric information problem, the firm introduced a costly quality signaling mechanism: in its online platform, the company certifies at a fee the car's inspection report mandated to be provided to consumers but deemed often unreliable. This chapter examines the effect of certification on the sale price and the days on the market. It also investigates which vehicles' inspection reports are more likely to be certified. by Dong Jae Eun. Ph. D. 2017-05-11T20:00:41Z 2017-05-11T20:00:41Z 2017 2017 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109014 986529540 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 152 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Economics.
Eun, Dong Jae
Market imperfections and market-based policy instruments
title Market imperfections and market-based policy instruments
title_full Market imperfections and market-based policy instruments
title_fullStr Market imperfections and market-based policy instruments
title_full_unstemmed Market imperfections and market-based policy instruments
title_short Market imperfections and market-based policy instruments
title_sort market imperfections and market based policy instruments
topic Economics.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109014
work_keys_str_mv AT eundongjae marketimperfectionsandmarketbasedpolicyinstruments