Responses
Thanks to Mitch, Zoltan and Liz for their insightful and constructive comments. Their expositions of what I am trying to do in the book seem to me entirely accurate, and their suggestions about the way the framework I develop can be modified and extended, as well as their observations about places w...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109326 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8503-8662 |
| _version_ | 1826199708042788864 |
|---|---|
| author | Stalnaker, Robert |
| author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy |
| author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Stalnaker, Robert |
| author_sort | Stalnaker, Robert |
| collection | MIT |
| description | Thanks to Mitch, Zoltan and Liz for their insightful and constructive comments. Their expositions of what I am trying to do in the book seem to me entirely accurate, and their suggestions about the way the framework I develop can be modified and extended, as well as their observations about places where more clarity is needed, are well taken. Mostly in these responses I will be elaborating and expressing agreement, though I will push back at just a few points. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:24:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | mit-1721.1/109326 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:24:48Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Springer Netherlands |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/1093262022-10-01T03:26:44Z Responses Stalnaker, Robert Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Stalnaker, Robert Thanks to Mitch, Zoltan and Liz for their insightful and constructive comments. Their expositions of what I am trying to do in the book seem to me entirely accurate, and their suggestions about the way the framework I develop can be modified and extended, as well as their observations about places where more clarity is needed, are well taken. Mostly in these responses I will be elaborating and expressing agreement, though I will push back at just a few points. 2017-05-24T19:40:28Z 2017-07-02T05:00:03Z 2016-09 2017-04-27T03:44:16Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0031-8116 1573-0883 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109326 Stalnaker, Robert. “Responses.” Philosophical Studies 174, no. 6 (September 15, 2016): 1629-1639. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8503-8662 en http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0782-4 Philosophical Studies Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht application/pdf Springer Netherlands Springer Netherlands |
| spellingShingle | Stalnaker, Robert Responses |
| title | Responses |
| title_full | Responses |
| title_fullStr | Responses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Responses |
| title_short | Responses |
| title_sort | responses |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109326 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8503-8662 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stalnakerrobert responses |