Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes

Many battery electrodes contain ensembles of nanoparticles that phase-separate on (de)intercalation. In such electrodes, the fraction of actively intercalating particles directly impacts cycle life: a vanishing population concentrates the current in a small number of particles, leading to current ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li, Yiyang, El Gabaly, Farid, Bartelt, Norman C., Sugar, Joshua D., Fenton, Kyle R., Cogswell, Daniel A., Kilcoyne, A. L. David, Tyliszczak, Tolek, Chueh, William C., Ferguson, Todd Richard, Smith, Raymond Barrett, Bazant, Martin Z
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110915
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-6781
_version_ 1811085977601441792
author Li, Yiyang
El Gabaly, Farid
Bartelt, Norman C.
Sugar, Joshua D.
Fenton, Kyle R.
Cogswell, Daniel A.
Kilcoyne, A. L. David
Tyliszczak, Tolek
Chueh, William C.
Ferguson, Todd Richard
Smith, Raymond Barrett
Bazant, Martin Z
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Li, Yiyang
El Gabaly, Farid
Bartelt, Norman C.
Sugar, Joshua D.
Fenton, Kyle R.
Cogswell, Daniel A.
Kilcoyne, A. L. David
Tyliszczak, Tolek
Chueh, William C.
Ferguson, Todd Richard
Smith, Raymond Barrett
Bazant, Martin Z
author_sort Li, Yiyang
collection MIT
description Many battery electrodes contain ensembles of nanoparticles that phase-separate on (de)intercalation. In such electrodes, the fraction of actively intercalating particles directly impacts cycle life: a vanishing population concentrates the current in a small number of particles, leading to current hotspots. Reports of the active particle population in the phase-separating electrode ​lithium iron phosphate (​LiFePO4; ​LFP) vary widely, ranging from near 0% (particle-by-particle) to 100% (concurrent intercalation). Using synchrotron-based X-ray microscopy, we probed the individual state-of-charge for over 3,000 ​LFP particles. We observed that the active population depends strongly on the cycling current, exhibiting particle-by-particle-like behaviour at low rates and increasingly concurrent behaviour at high rates, consistent with our phase-field porous electrode simulations. Contrary to intuition, the current density, or current per active internal surface area, is nearly invariant with the global electrode cycling rate. Rather, the electrode accommodates higher current by increasing the active particle population. This behaviour results from thermodynamic transformation barriers in ​LFP, and such a phenomenon probably extends to other phase-separating battery materials. We propose that modifying the transformation barrier and exchange current density can increase the active population and thus the current homogeneity. This could introduce new paradigms to enhance the cycle life of phase-separating battery electrodes.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:18:57Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/110915
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:18:57Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1109152022-10-01T14:28:20Z Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes Li, Yiyang El Gabaly, Farid Bartelt, Norman C. Sugar, Joshua D. Fenton, Kyle R. Cogswell, Daniel A. Kilcoyne, A. L. David Tyliszczak, Tolek Chueh, William C. Ferguson, Todd Richard Smith, Raymond Barrett Bazant, Martin Z Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics Bazant, Martin Z. Ferguson, Todd Richard Smith, Raymond Barrett Bazant, Martin Z Many battery electrodes contain ensembles of nanoparticles that phase-separate on (de)intercalation. In such electrodes, the fraction of actively intercalating particles directly impacts cycle life: a vanishing population concentrates the current in a small number of particles, leading to current hotspots. Reports of the active particle population in the phase-separating electrode ​lithium iron phosphate (​LiFePO4; ​LFP) vary widely, ranging from near 0% (particle-by-particle) to 100% (concurrent intercalation). Using synchrotron-based X-ray microscopy, we probed the individual state-of-charge for over 3,000 ​LFP particles. We observed that the active population depends strongly on the cycling current, exhibiting particle-by-particle-like behaviour at low rates and increasingly concurrent behaviour at high rates, consistent with our phase-field porous electrode simulations. Contrary to intuition, the current density, or current per active internal surface area, is nearly invariant with the global electrode cycling rate. Rather, the electrode accommodates higher current by increasing the active particle population. This behaviour results from thermodynamic transformation barriers in ​LFP, and such a phenomenon probably extends to other phase-separating battery materials. We propose that modifying the transformation barrier and exchange current density can increase the active population and thus the current homogeneity. This could introduce new paradigms to enhance the cycle life of phase-separating battery electrodes. 2017-08-03T13:59:55Z 2017-08-03T13:59:55Z 2014-09 2014-02 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1476-1122 1476-4660 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110915 Li, Yiyang; El Gabaly, Farid; Ferguson, Todd R. et al. “Current-Induced Transition from Particle-by-Particle to Concurrent Intercalation in Phase-Separating Battery Electrodes.” Nature Materials 13, 12 (September 2014): 1149–1156 © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-6781 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat4084 Nature Materials Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Nature Publishing Group Prof. Bazant via Erja Kajosalo
spellingShingle Li, Yiyang
El Gabaly, Farid
Bartelt, Norman C.
Sugar, Joshua D.
Fenton, Kyle R.
Cogswell, Daniel A.
Kilcoyne, A. L. David
Tyliszczak, Tolek
Chueh, William C.
Ferguson, Todd Richard
Smith, Raymond Barrett
Bazant, Martin Z
Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes
title Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes
title_full Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes
title_fullStr Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes
title_full_unstemmed Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes
title_short Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes
title_sort current induced transition from particle by particle to concurrent intercalation in phase separating battery electrodes
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110915
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-6781
work_keys_str_mv AT liyiyang currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT elgabalyfarid currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT barteltnormanc currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT sugarjoshuad currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT fentonkyler currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT cogswelldaniela currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT kilcoynealdavid currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT tyliszczaktolek currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT chuehwilliamc currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT fergusontoddrichard currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT smithraymondbarrett currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes
AT bazantmartinz currentinducedtransitionfromparticlebyparticletoconcurrentintercalationinphaseseparatingbatteryelectrodes