Using design maturity assessments to improve new technology implementation in active production environments

Thesis: M.B.A., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, in conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT, 2017.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arch, Nicholas Luke
Other Authors: Thomas Roemer and David Hardt.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111484
_version_ 1811089439805407232
author Arch, Nicholas Luke
author2 Thomas Roemer and David Hardt.
author_facet Thomas Roemer and David Hardt.
Arch, Nicholas Luke
author_sort Arch, Nicholas Luke
collection MIT
description Thesis: M.B.A., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, in conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT, 2017.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:19:12Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/111484
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:19:12Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1114842022-01-27T21:10:43Z Using design maturity assessments to improve new technology implementation in active production environments Arch, Nicholas Luke Thomas Roemer and David Hardt. Leaders for Global Operations Program. Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering Sloan School of Management Sloan School of Management. Mechanical Engineering. Leaders for Global Operations Program. Thesis: M.B.A., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, in conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT, 2017. Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, in conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT, 2017. Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 123-124). Without the design, development, and implementation of new technologies, companies that are currently innovative will be quickly surpassed by their competitors. Company A, a large aerospace company with a long history of introducing new technologies, is aiming to improve its new technology implementation process to continue to be successful in a competitive industry. While generally successful when implementing new technologies, Company A frequently faces unexpected challenges during implementation. The ability to effectively implement technologies in production environments will increase the likelihood that the business case for a new technology will be realized. Company A is in the process of implementing an automated fabrication solution for Component 1 that could eliminate risks associated with ergonomics and potential production volume increases. The goal of this project was not only to create a plan to aid the implementation of the automated fabrication technology for Component 1, but to broadly research technology implementation to determine how industrial companies can turn implementation into a competitive advantage. While creating multiple plans to implement the automated fabrication technology, research was performed about risk management, available tools to aid the implementation process, and lessons learned from past implementations. A significant part of new technology implementation involves identifying, prioritizing, and mitigating risk associated with the technology and the production system. There are many general and company-specific tools that aim to aid this process, but most of these tools focus on the technology, not the production system. The theory of Operational Readiness was developed as a way to combine the advantages of numerous design maturity assessment tools. Operational Readiness involves confirming that the new technology satisfies its requirements, is manufacturable, and fits within the overall product system. Operational Readiness also ensures that the production system is ready to accept the new technology. By utilizing Operational Readiness, cross-functional design, development, and implementation teams will be forced to take a system-wide view of the new technology implementation. This rigorous assessment process will be challenging and time-consuming, but the results will generate significant benefits to companies that are willing and able to use the theory of Operational Readiness. by Nicholas Luke Arch. M.B.A. S.M. 2017-09-15T15:36:13Z 2017-09-15T15:36:13Z 2017 2017 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111484 1003322327 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 124 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Sloan School of Management.
Mechanical Engineering.
Leaders for Global Operations Program.
Arch, Nicholas Luke
Using design maturity assessments to improve new technology implementation in active production environments
title Using design maturity assessments to improve new technology implementation in active production environments
title_full Using design maturity assessments to improve new technology implementation in active production environments
title_fullStr Using design maturity assessments to improve new technology implementation in active production environments
title_full_unstemmed Using design maturity assessments to improve new technology implementation in active production environments
title_short Using design maturity assessments to improve new technology implementation in active production environments
title_sort using design maturity assessments to improve new technology implementation in active production environments
topic Sloan School of Management.
Mechanical Engineering.
Leaders for Global Operations Program.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111484
work_keys_str_mv AT archnicholasluke usingdesignmaturityassessmentstoimprovenewtechnologyimplementationinactiveproductionenvironments