Difference between memory and prediction in linear recurrent networks
Recurrent networks are trained to memorize their input better, often in the hopes that such training will increase the ability of the network to predict. We show that networks designed to memorize input can be arbitrarily bad at prediction. We also find, for several types of inputs, that one-node ne...
Main Author: | Marzen, Sarah E. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2018
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114553 |
Similar Items
-
Recurrent correlation associative memories
by: Teo, Mei Ping
Published: (2014) -
Comparison of recurrent neural network and long-short term memory technique in predicting mortality rate in Malaysia
by: Anupriya, S., et al.
Published: (2023) -
Sequence prediction using recurrent neural network
by: Nguyen, Phan Huy
Published: (2017) -
Severity prediction of traffic accidents with recurrent neural networks
by: Sameen, Maher Ibrahim, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Severity prediction of traffic accidents with recurrent neural networks
by: Sameen, Maher Ibrahim, et al.
Published: (2017)