Difference between memory and prediction in linear recurrent networks
Recurrent networks are trained to memorize their input better, often in the hopes that such training will increase the ability of the network to predict. We show that networks designed to memorize input can be arbitrarily bad at prediction. We also find, for several types of inputs, that one-node ne...
Main Author: | Marzen, Sarah E. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2018
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114553 |
Similar Items
-
Optimized bacteria are environmental prediction engines
by: Marzen, Sarah E., et al.
Published: (2018) -
Nearly maximally predictive features and their dimensions
by: Marzen, Sarah E., et al.
Published: (2017) -
Comparison of recurrent neural network and long-short term memory technique in predicting mortality rate in Malaysia
by: Anupriya, S., et al.
Published: (2023) -
Prediction and Dissipation in Nonequilibrium Molecular Sensors: Conditionally Markovian Channels Driven by Memoryful Environments
by: Marzen, Sarah E, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Sequence prediction using recurrent neural network
by: Nguyen, Phan Huy
Published: (2017)