Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert

Other things being equal, people ought to get what they deserve. If there is such a thing as common sense, this claim is part of it. But life is complicated, and this claim does not get us very far. Suppose I could give A what he deserves or give B what she deserves, but not both; what should I do?...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Skow, Bradford
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Published: University of Chicago Press 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115387
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540
_version_ 1811085490603950080
author Skow, Bradford
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Skow, Bradford
author_sort Skow, Bradford
collection MIT
description Other things being equal, people ought to get what they deserve. If there is such a thing as common sense, this claim is part of it. But life is complicated, and this claim does not get us very far. Suppose I could give A what he deserves or give B what she deserves, but not both; what should I do? For Shelly Kagan this question lies on the known edge of a huge expanse of unexplored philosophical terrain. The Geometry of Desert is Kagan’s report on what he found there.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:10:25Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/115387
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:10:25Z
publishDate 2018
publisher University of Chicago Press
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1153872022-10-01T13:31:55Z Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert Skow, Bradford Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Skow, Bradford Other things being equal, people ought to get what they deserve. If there is such a thing as common sense, this claim is part of it. But life is complicated, and this claim does not get us very far. Suppose I could give A what he deserves or give B what she deserves, but not both; what should I do? For Shelly Kagan this question lies on the known edge of a huge expanse of unexplored philosophical terrain. The Geometry of Desert is Kagan’s report on what he found there. 2018-05-16T14:04:11Z 2018-05-16T14:04:11Z 2014-01 2018-05-14T12:12:21Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0014-1704 1539-297X http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115387 Skow, Bradford. “Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Pp. Xviii+656. $74.00 (cloth).” Ethics 124, no. 2 (January 2014): 417–426. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/673429 Ethics Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf University of Chicago Press University of Chicago Press
spellingShingle Skow, Bradford
Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert
title Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert
title_full Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert
title_fullStr Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert
title_full_unstemmed Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert
title_short Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert
title_sort kagan shelly the geometry of desert
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115387
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540
work_keys_str_mv AT skowbradford kaganshellythegeometryofdesert