Reply to “Comment on ‘Ultrafast terahertz-field-driven ionic response in ferroelectric

Reply to “Comment on ‘Ultrafast terahertz-field-driven ionic response in ferroelectric

In this reply to S. Durbin's comment on our original paper “Ultrafast terahertz-field-driven ionic response in ferroelectric BaTiO₃,” we concur that his final equations 8 and 9 more accurately describe the change in diffracted intensity as a function of Ti displacement. We also provide an alter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, F., Zhu, Y., Liu, S., Qi, Y., Quirin, F., Enquist, H., Zalden, P., Hu, T., Goodfellow, J., Sher, M.-J., Hoffmann, M. C., Zhu, D., Lemke, H., Glownia, J., Chollet, M., Damodaran, A. R., Park, J., Cai, Z., Jung, I. W., Highland, M. J., Walko, D. A., Freeland, J. W., Evans, P. G., Vailionis, A., Larsson, J., Rappe, A. M., Sokolowski-Tinten, K., Martin, L. W., Wen, H., Lindenberg, A. M., Hwang, H. Y., Brandt, Nathaniel Curran, Lu, Jian, Nelson, Keith Adam
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemistry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/116833
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7706-8121
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-5418
Description
Summary:In this reply to S. Durbin's comment on our original paper “Ultrafast terahertz-field-driven ionic response in ferroelectric BaTiO₃,” we concur that his final equations 8 and 9 more accurately describe the change in diffracted intensity as a function of Ti displacement. We also provide an alternative derivation based on an ensemble average over unit cells. The conclusions of the paper are unaffected by this correction.

Similar Items