Do classified boards protect top management? : evidence from shareholder proposals

Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2018.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martins, Fernando Miguel Pinto
Other Authors: David Thesmar.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117995
_version_ 1826209038626455552
author Martins, Fernando Miguel Pinto
author2 David Thesmar.
author_facet David Thesmar.
Martins, Fernando Miguel Pinto
author_sort Martins, Fernando Miguel Pinto
collection MIT
description Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2018.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:16:43Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/117995
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:16:43Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1179952019-04-12T14:39:32Z Do classified boards protect top management? : evidence from shareholder proposals Martins, Fernando Miguel Pinto David Thesmar. Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2018. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 38-40). This paper examines the relationship between classified boards and managerial entrenchment by applying a panel regression discontinuity design to shareholder proposals on board declassification. We focus on shareholder proposals that pass or fail by a small margin of votes in order to provide a causal estimate of the impact of board declassification. We find that shareholder proposal approval leads to a reduction in CEO compensation, an increase in the likelihood of CEO replacement, a positive but insignificant impact on pay-performance elasticity, and an increase in firm value. The reduction in CEO compensation is strongest among firms who possess weaker levels of corporate governance. These findings suggest that classified boards protect top management and lead to higher levels of managerial entrenchment. by Fernando Miguel Pinto Martins. S.M. in Management Research 2018-09-17T15:53:05Z 2018-09-17T15:53:05Z 2018 2018 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117995 1051300054 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 50 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Sloan School of Management.
Martins, Fernando Miguel Pinto
Do classified boards protect top management? : evidence from shareholder proposals
title Do classified boards protect top management? : evidence from shareholder proposals
title_full Do classified boards protect top management? : evidence from shareholder proposals
title_fullStr Do classified boards protect top management? : evidence from shareholder proposals
title_full_unstemmed Do classified boards protect top management? : evidence from shareholder proposals
title_short Do classified boards protect top management? : evidence from shareholder proposals
title_sort do classified boards protect top management evidence from shareholder proposals
topic Sloan School of Management.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117995
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsfernandomiguelpinto doclassifiedboardsprotecttopmanagementevidencefromshareholderproposals