"It's no problem" : using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange
Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2018.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118012 |
_version_ | 1811081371069710336 |
---|---|
author | Friis, Simon C |
author2 | Ezra W. Zuckerman Sivan. |
author_facet | Ezra W. Zuckerman Sivan. Friis, Simon C |
author_sort | Friis, Simon C |
collection | MIT |
description | Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2018. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:45:37Z |
format | Thesis |
id | mit-1721.1/118012 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | eng |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:45:37Z |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1180122019-04-12T11:21:14Z "It's no problem" : using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange It is s no problem : using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange Using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange Friis, Simon C Ezra W. Zuckerman Sivan. Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2018. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 44-47). Social exchange is paradoxically characterized by actors who expect reciprocity (Blau 1986), yet vigorously downplay these expectations using language we refer to as reverse bargaining. For example, responses to thanks such as "it's no problem" and "the pleasure was all mine" are ubiquitous in social exchange. The theory of local action (Leifer 1988a; Leifer 1988b) understands reverse bargaining as a tactic that defers status claims until they are less risky to make, but this explanation is problematic because actors often initiate social exchange to create value (e.g., Uzzi 1997), not capture status. The key insight of our theory is that givers seeking reciprocity must balance two competing objectives: to ensure that the receiver recognizes a debt she must repay; and to mitigate the receiver's suspicion that the giver's ulterior motive is to capture value from the receiver. Results from two online experiments support our prediction that reverse bargaining is used to signal benign motive. The second experiment further suggests that givers will mix reverse bargaining with emphases of debt when they are anxious about reciprocity. by Simon C. Friis. S.M. in Management Research 2018-09-17T15:53:46Z 2018-09-17T15:53:46Z 2018 2018 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118012 1051454094 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 66 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
spellingShingle | Sloan School of Management. Friis, Simon C "It's no problem" : using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange |
title | "It's no problem" : using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange |
title_full | "It's no problem" : using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange |
title_fullStr | "It's no problem" : using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange |
title_full_unstemmed | "It's no problem" : using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange |
title_short | "It's no problem" : using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second-order opportunism in social exchange |
title_sort | it s no problem using reverse bargaining to manage the threat of second order opportunism in social exchange |
topic | Sloan School of Management. |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT friissimonc itsnoproblemusingreversebargainingtomanagethethreatofsecondorderopportunisminsocialexchange AT friissimonc itissnoproblemusingreversebargainingtomanagethethreatofsecondorderopportunisminsocialexchange AT friissimonc usingreversebargainingtomanagethethreatofsecondorderopportunisminsocialexchange |