Uberization Effects on Freight Procurement

According to a report by A. T. Kearney, in 2016 the US business spent $1,392.64B on logistics costs. 90% of transportation spending is procured in the form of Long Term Contracts. A Long Term Contract drives long procurement cycles that can last over 6 months, which results in significant financial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helguera Sánchez, Ignacio, Hendra Mukti, Lydia Paramita
Language:en_US
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118121
_version_ 1826196345481854976
author Helguera Sánchez, Ignacio
Hendra Mukti, Lydia Paramita
author_facet Helguera Sánchez, Ignacio
Hendra Mukti, Lydia Paramita
author_sort Helguera Sánchez, Ignacio
collection MIT
description According to a report by A. T. Kearney, in 2016 the US business spent $1,392.64B on logistics costs. 90% of transportation spending is procured in the form of Long Term Contracts. A Long Term Contract drives long procurement cycles that can last over 6 months, which results in significant financial risk for both shippers and carriers. It is estimated that 10% of freight under Long Term Contracts fall out and ends up in the spot market due to low tender acceptance and market volatility. The spot market, on the other hand, can be highly dynamic. Typically, shipper pays 20% more for freight in spot market compared to what would be agreed upon in a Long Term Contract. Regardless of the freight procurement method, shippers are constantly faced with market volatility and are left scrambling to find a new carrier capacity when carrier fall off occurs. Assuming a shipper could book a truck instantly, how would their procurement strategy and supply chain network change? We hypothesized that there is a financial benefit to all parties from faster, more liquid transportation transactions, through lower labor costs spent on freight procurement transaction and shorter planning cycles in transportation procurement. Digital freight matching via an on-demand app, facilitates long arduous transactions in a real- time low-cost manner. Using System Dynamics models, this project developed a behaviorally based conceptual model to analyze effects of a digital freight matching app on shippers’ freight procurement. Our analysis shows the shipper will choose a more efficient, low-cost alternative to the spot market, provided that the shipper’s total spending is lower than what would be agreed upon in a Long-Term Contract. Digital freight matching benefits shippers by providing needed freight capacity at lower cost. Individual changes in market volatility, shipper volatility, app efficiencies, or carrier and shipper adoption rates would potentially add more than 10% variability in freight rate paid by shipper and more than 50% digital freight matching app adoption rate for both shippers and carriers.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:25:26Z
id mit-1721.1/118121
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:25:26Z
publishDate 2018
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1181212019-04-11T13:08:29Z Uberization Effects on Freight Procurement Helguera Sánchez, Ignacio Hendra Mukti, Lydia Paramita According to a report by A. T. Kearney, in 2016 the US business spent $1,392.64B on logistics costs. 90% of transportation spending is procured in the form of Long Term Contracts. A Long Term Contract drives long procurement cycles that can last over 6 months, which results in significant financial risk for both shippers and carriers. It is estimated that 10% of freight under Long Term Contracts fall out and ends up in the spot market due to low tender acceptance and market volatility. The spot market, on the other hand, can be highly dynamic. Typically, shipper pays 20% more for freight in spot market compared to what would be agreed upon in a Long Term Contract. Regardless of the freight procurement method, shippers are constantly faced with market volatility and are left scrambling to find a new carrier capacity when carrier fall off occurs. Assuming a shipper could book a truck instantly, how would their procurement strategy and supply chain network change? We hypothesized that there is a financial benefit to all parties from faster, more liquid transportation transactions, through lower labor costs spent on freight procurement transaction and shorter planning cycles in transportation procurement. Digital freight matching via an on-demand app, facilitates long arduous transactions in a real- time low-cost manner. Using System Dynamics models, this project developed a behaviorally based conceptual model to analyze effects of a digital freight matching app on shippers’ freight procurement. Our analysis shows the shipper will choose a more efficient, low-cost alternative to the spot market, provided that the shipper’s total spending is lower than what would be agreed upon in a Long-Term Contract. Digital freight matching benefits shippers by providing needed freight capacity at lower cost. Individual changes in market volatility, shipper volatility, app efficiencies, or carrier and shipper adoption rates would potentially add more than 10% variability in freight rate paid by shipper and more than 50% digital freight matching app adoption rate for both shippers and carriers. 2018-09-17T20:06:12Z 2018-09-17T20:06:12Z 2018 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118121 en_US application/pdf
spellingShingle Helguera Sánchez, Ignacio
Hendra Mukti, Lydia Paramita
Uberization Effects on Freight Procurement
title Uberization Effects on Freight Procurement
title_full Uberization Effects on Freight Procurement
title_fullStr Uberization Effects on Freight Procurement
title_full_unstemmed Uberization Effects on Freight Procurement
title_short Uberization Effects on Freight Procurement
title_sort uberization effects on freight procurement
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118121
work_keys_str_mv AT helguerasanchezignacio uberizationeffectsonfreightprocurement
AT hendramuktilydiaparamita uberizationeffectsonfreightprocurement