Cost analysis and comparison of tray container style storage and stackable tote style storage

Thesis: M. Eng. in Advanced Manufacturing and Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2018.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joh, Youngjun
Other Authors: Maria Yang.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118715
_version_ 1811072995103342592
author Joh, Youngjun
author2 Maria Yang.
author_facet Maria Yang.
Joh, Youngjun
author_sort Joh, Youngjun
collection MIT
description Thesis: M. Eng. in Advanced Manufacturing and Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2018.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:26:56Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/118715
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:26:56Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1187152019-04-11T06:41:30Z Cost analysis and comparison of tray container style storage and stackable tote style storage Joh, Youngjun Maria Yang. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mechanical Engineering. Thesis: M. Eng. in Advanced Manufacturing and Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2018. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (page 49). With the emerging interest in automated distribution centers, shelves operated by mobile robots are also rising in importance. This paper focuses on comparing the cost of two potential shelf designs for storing product in an automated distribution center, a tray container style shelf and a stackable tote style shelf. Tray container style shelf has lower manufacturing costs, assembly cost and time, while stackable tote style shelf had competitive edge on packaging and shipping costs, and space utilization. The manufacturing cost, packaging cost, and shipping costs $174.44, $59.77, and $39.04 respectively for tray container shelf, and $380.83, $25.98, and $16.9 for stackable tote shelf. The assembly time and space utilization were 8 minutes and 81.5% for tray container shelf, and 17.2 minutes and 84.4% for stackable totes. Overall, stackable tote shelves cost 55% more, but have 2.9% space utilization advantage, which can have more cost savings in an urban distribution center. by Youngjun Joh. M. Eng. in Advanced Manufacturing and Design 2018-10-22T18:46:07Z 2018-10-22T18:46:07Z 2018 2018 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118715 1057120300 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 49 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Mechanical Engineering.
Joh, Youngjun
Cost analysis and comparison of tray container style storage and stackable tote style storage
title Cost analysis and comparison of tray container style storage and stackable tote style storage
title_full Cost analysis and comparison of tray container style storage and stackable tote style storage
title_fullStr Cost analysis and comparison of tray container style storage and stackable tote style storage
title_full_unstemmed Cost analysis and comparison of tray container style storage and stackable tote style storage
title_short Cost analysis and comparison of tray container style storage and stackable tote style storage
title_sort cost analysis and comparison of tray container style storage and stackable tote style storage
topic Mechanical Engineering.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118715
work_keys_str_mv AT johyoungjun costanalysisandcomparisonoftraycontainerstylestorageandstackabletotestylestorage