Quantitative Comparison of Vernier Permanent-Magnet Motors with Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor for Hybrid Electric Vehicles
In this paper, three Vernier permanent-magnet (VPM) motor, namely the inner-rotor VPM (IR-VPM) motor, the outer-rotor VPM (OR-VPM) motor and the OR consequent-pole VPM (OR-CP-VPM) motor are proposed for the hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) applications. Owing to employment of toroidal-winding arrangeme...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118872 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-4602 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2472-3380 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-2410 |
_version_ | 1811091855110045696 |
---|---|
author | Iyer, K. Lakshmi Varaha Sinkular, Jasmin Jijina Lee, Christopher Bhalla, Krishan Iyer, K. Lee, Ho Tin Angle, Matthew G Bhalla, Krishan Kant Qasim, Mohammad Mowafaq Mei, Jie Mohammadiyangijeh, Sajjad Kirtley Jr, James L |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics Iyer, K. Lakshmi Varaha Sinkular, Jasmin Jijina Lee, Christopher Bhalla, Krishan Iyer, K. Lee, Ho Tin Angle, Matthew G Bhalla, Krishan Kant Qasim, Mohammad Mowafaq Mei, Jie Mohammadiyangijeh, Sajjad Kirtley Jr, James L |
author_sort | Iyer, K. Lakshmi Varaha |
collection | MIT |
description | In this paper, three Vernier permanent-magnet (VPM) motor, namely the inner-rotor VPM (IR-VPM) motor, the outer-rotor VPM (OR-VPM) motor and the OR consequent-pole VPM (OR-CP-VPM) motor are proposed for the hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) applications. Owing to employment of toroidal-winding arrangement, the OR-VPM and the OR-CP-VPM motors can enjoy better material utilization and easier manufacturing process than its IR-VPM counterpart. Meanwhile the OR-CP-VPM motor can utilize the consequent-pole topology to minimize flux leakage that exists in conventional design. With the support of finite element method (FEM), the motor performances among the VPM motors and the profound interior permanent-magnet (IPM) motor can be compared quantitatively. Keywords: consequent-pole; hybrid electric vehicle (HEV); interior permanent-magnet motor; overlapping-winding; toroidal-winding; Vernier permanent-magnet (VPM) motor |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T15:09:07Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/118872 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T15:09:07Z |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1188722022-10-02T00:56:13Z Quantitative Comparison of Vernier Permanent-Magnet Motors with Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor for Hybrid Electric Vehicles Iyer, K. Lakshmi Varaha Sinkular, Jasmin Jijina Lee, Christopher Bhalla, Krishan Iyer, K. Lee, Ho Tin Angle, Matthew G Bhalla, Krishan Kant Qasim, Mohammad Mowafaq Mei, Jie Mohammadiyangijeh, Sajjad Kirtley Jr, James L Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics Lee, Ho Tin Angle, Matthew G Bhalla, Krishan Kant Qasim, Mohammad Mowafaq Mei, Jie Mohammadiyangijeh, Sajjad Kirtley Jr, James L In this paper, three Vernier permanent-magnet (VPM) motor, namely the inner-rotor VPM (IR-VPM) motor, the outer-rotor VPM (OR-VPM) motor and the OR consequent-pole VPM (OR-CP-VPM) motor are proposed for the hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) applications. Owing to employment of toroidal-winding arrangement, the OR-VPM and the OR-CP-VPM motors can enjoy better material utilization and easier manufacturing process than its IR-VPM counterpart. Meanwhile the OR-CP-VPM motor can utilize the consequent-pole topology to minimize flux leakage that exists in conventional design. With the support of finite element method (FEM), the motor performances among the VPM motors and the profound interior permanent-magnet (IPM) motor can be compared quantitatively. Keywords: consequent-pole; hybrid electric vehicle (HEV); interior permanent-magnet motor; overlapping-winding; toroidal-winding; Vernier permanent-magnet (VPM) motor 2018-11-05T14:43:06Z 2018-11-05T14:43:06Z 2018-09 2018-07 2018-10-24T08:16:03Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1996-1073 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118872 Lee, Christopher et al. "Quantitative Comparison of Vernier Permanent-Magnet Motors with Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor for Hybrid Electric Vehicles." Energies 11, 10 (September 2018): 2546 © 2018 The Authors https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-4602 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2472-3380 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-2410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en11102546 Energies Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf MDPI AG Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
spellingShingle | Iyer, K. Lakshmi Varaha Sinkular, Jasmin Jijina Lee, Christopher Bhalla, Krishan Iyer, K. Lee, Ho Tin Angle, Matthew G Bhalla, Krishan Kant Qasim, Mohammad Mowafaq Mei, Jie Mohammadiyangijeh, Sajjad Kirtley Jr, James L Quantitative Comparison of Vernier Permanent-Magnet Motors with Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor for Hybrid Electric Vehicles |
title | Quantitative Comparison of Vernier Permanent-Magnet Motors with Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor for Hybrid Electric Vehicles |
title_full | Quantitative Comparison of Vernier Permanent-Magnet Motors with Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor for Hybrid Electric Vehicles |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Comparison of Vernier Permanent-Magnet Motors with Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor for Hybrid Electric Vehicles |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Comparison of Vernier Permanent-Magnet Motors with Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor for Hybrid Electric Vehicles |
title_short | Quantitative Comparison of Vernier Permanent-Magnet Motors with Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor for Hybrid Electric Vehicles |
title_sort | quantitative comparison of vernier permanent magnet motors with interior permanent magnet motor for hybrid electric vehicles |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118872 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-4602 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2472-3380 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-2410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iyerklakshmivaraha quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT sinkularjasminjijina quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT leechristopher quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT bhallakrishan quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT iyerk quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT leehotin quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT anglematthewg quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT bhallakrishankant quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT qasimmohammadmowafaq quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT meijie quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT mohammadiyangijehsajjad quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles AT kirtleyjrjamesl quantitativecomparisonofvernierpermanentmagnetmotorswithinteriorpermanentmagnetmotorforhybridelectricvehicles |