Controlling Physical Interactions: Humans Do Not Minimize Muscle Effort

Physical interaction with tools is ubiquitous in functional activities of daily living. While tool use is considered a hallmark of human behavior, how humans control such physical interactions is still poorly understood. When humans perform a motor task, it is commonly suggested that the central ner...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koeppen, Ryan P., Huber, Meghan E, Sternad, Dagmar, Hogan, Neville
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Published: ASME International 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119392
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-2145
_version_ 1811084762286129152
author Koeppen, Ryan P.
Huber, Meghan E
Sternad, Dagmar
Hogan, Neville
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Koeppen, Ryan P.
Huber, Meghan E
Sternad, Dagmar
Hogan, Neville
author_sort Koeppen, Ryan P.
collection MIT
description Physical interaction with tools is ubiquitous in functional activities of daily living. While tool use is considered a hallmark of human behavior, how humans control such physical interactions is still poorly understood. When humans perform a motor task, it is commonly suggested that the central nervous system coordinates the musculo-skeletal system to minimize muscle effort. In this paper, we tested if this notion holds true for motor tasks that involve physical interaction. Specifically, we investigated whether humans minimize muscle forces to control physical interaction with a circular kinematic constraint. Using a simplified arm model, we derived three predictions for how humans should behave if they were minimizing muscular effort to perform the task. First, we predicted that subjects would exert workless, radial forces on the constraint. Second, we predicted that the muscles would be deactivated when they could not contribute to work. Third, we predicted that when moving very slowly along the constraint, the pattern of muscle activity would not differ between clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) motions. To test these predictions, we instructed human subjects to move a robot handle around a virtual, circular constraint at a constant tangential velocity. To reduce the effect of forces that might arise from incomplete compensation of neuro-musculoskeletal dynamics, the target tangential speed was set to an extremely slow pace (~1 revolution every 13.3 seconds). Ultimately, the results of human experiment did not support the predictions derived from our model of minimizing muscular effort. While subjects did exert workless forces, they did not deactivate muscles as predicted. Furthermore, muscle activation patterns differed between CW and CCW motions about the constraint. These findings demonstrate that minimizing muscle effort is not a significant factor in human performance of this constrained-motion task. Instead, the central nervous system likely prioritizes reducing other costs, such as computational effort, over muscle effort to control physical interactions.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T12:57:11Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/119392
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T12:57:11Z
publishDate 2018
publisher ASME International
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1193922022-09-28T11:06:40Z Controlling Physical Interactions: Humans Do Not Minimize Muscle Effort Koeppen, Ryan P. Huber, Meghan E Sternad, Dagmar Hogan, Neville Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering Koeppen, Ryan P. Huber, Meghan E Sternad, Dagmar Hogan, Neville Physical interaction with tools is ubiquitous in functional activities of daily living. While tool use is considered a hallmark of human behavior, how humans control such physical interactions is still poorly understood. When humans perform a motor task, it is commonly suggested that the central nervous system coordinates the musculo-skeletal system to minimize muscle effort. In this paper, we tested if this notion holds true for motor tasks that involve physical interaction. Specifically, we investigated whether humans minimize muscle forces to control physical interaction with a circular kinematic constraint. Using a simplified arm model, we derived three predictions for how humans should behave if they were minimizing muscular effort to perform the task. First, we predicted that subjects would exert workless, radial forces on the constraint. Second, we predicted that the muscles would be deactivated when they could not contribute to work. Third, we predicted that when moving very slowly along the constraint, the pattern of muscle activity would not differ between clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) motions. To test these predictions, we instructed human subjects to move a robot handle around a virtual, circular constraint at a constant tangential velocity. To reduce the effect of forces that might arise from incomplete compensation of neuro-musculoskeletal dynamics, the target tangential speed was set to an extremely slow pace (~1 revolution every 13.3 seconds). Ultimately, the results of human experiment did not support the predictions derived from our model of minimizing muscular effort. While subjects did exert workless forces, they did not deactivate muscles as predicted. Furthermore, muscle activation patterns differed between CW and CCW motions about the constraint. These findings demonstrate that minimizing muscle effort is not a significant factor in human performance of this constrained-motion task. Instead, the central nervous system likely prioritizes reducing other costs, such as computational effort, over muscle effort to control physical interactions. National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R01-HD087089) National Science Foundation (U.S.). National Robotics Initiative (NSF-NRI 1637824) National Science Foundation (U.S.). EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (NSF-EAGER-1548501) Eric P. and Evelyn E. Newman Fund Gloria Blake Endowment Fund National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R01-HD081346) National Science Foundation (U.S.). National Robotics Initiative (NSF-NRI 1637854) National Science Foundation (U.S.). EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (NSF-EAGER-1548514) 2018-12-03T17:12:23Z 2018-12-03T17:12:23Z 2017-10 2018-11-30T19:02:24Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper 978-0-7918-5827-1 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119392 Koeppen, Ryan, Meghan E. Huber, Dagmar Sternad, and Neville Hogan. “Controlling Physical Interactions: Humans Do Not Minimize Muscle Effort.” Volume 1: Aerospace Applications; Advances in Control Design Methods; Bio Engineering Applications; Advances in Non-Linear Control; Adaptive and Intelligent Systems Control; Advances in Wind Energy Systems; Advances in Robotics; Assistive and Rehabilitation Robotics; Biomedical and Neural Systems Modeling, Diagnostics, and Control; Bio-Mechatronics and Physical Human Robot; Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Autonomous Vehicles; Automotive Systems (October 11, 2017). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-2145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2017-5202 Volume 1: Aerospace Applications; Advances in Control Design Methods; Bio Engineering Applications; Advances in Non-Linear Control; Adaptive and Intelligent Systems Control; Advances in Wind Energy Systems; Advances in Robotics; Assistive and Rehabilitation Robotics; Biomedical and Neural Systems Modeling, Diagnostics, and Control; Bio-Mechatronics and Physical Human Robot; Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Autonomous Vehicles; Automotive Systems Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf ASME International ASME
spellingShingle Koeppen, Ryan P.
Huber, Meghan E
Sternad, Dagmar
Hogan, Neville
Controlling Physical Interactions: Humans Do Not Minimize Muscle Effort
title Controlling Physical Interactions: Humans Do Not Minimize Muscle Effort
title_full Controlling Physical Interactions: Humans Do Not Minimize Muscle Effort
title_fullStr Controlling Physical Interactions: Humans Do Not Minimize Muscle Effort
title_full_unstemmed Controlling Physical Interactions: Humans Do Not Minimize Muscle Effort
title_short Controlling Physical Interactions: Humans Do Not Minimize Muscle Effort
title_sort controlling physical interactions humans do not minimize muscle effort
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119392
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-2145
work_keys_str_mv AT koeppenryanp controllingphysicalinteractionshumansdonotminimizemuscleeffort
AT hubermeghane controllingphysicalinteractionshumansdonotminimizemuscleeffort
AT sternaddagmar controllingphysicalinteractionshumansdonotminimizemuscleeffort
AT hoganneville controllingphysicalinteractionshumansdonotminimizemuscleeffort