Comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic Helicobacter species

Background The genus Helicobacter are gram-negative, microaerobic, flagellated, mucus-inhabiting bacteria associated with gastrointestinal inflammation and classified as gastric or enterohepatic Helicobacter species (EHS) according to host species and colonization niche. While there...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mannion, Anthony, Shen, Zeli, Fox, James G
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Biomed Central Ltd 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119470
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9307-6116
_version_ 1826188615593492480
author Mannion, Anthony
Shen, Zeli
Fox, James G
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineering
Mannion, Anthony
Shen, Zeli
Fox, James G
author_sort Mannion, Anthony
collection MIT
description Background The genus Helicobacter are gram-negative, microaerobic, flagellated, mucus-inhabiting bacteria associated with gastrointestinal inflammation and classified as gastric or enterohepatic Helicobacter species (EHS) according to host species and colonization niche. While there are over 30 official species, little is known about the physiology and pathogenic mechanisms of EHS, which account for most in the genus, as well as what genetic factors differentiate gastric versus EHS, given they inhabit different hosts and colonization niches. The objective of this study was to perform a whole-genus comparative analysis of over 100 gastric versus EHS genomes in order to identify genetic determinants that distinguish these Helicobacter species and provide insights about their evolution/adaptation to different hosts, colonization niches, and mechanisms of virulence. Results Whole-genome phylogeny organized Helicobacter species according to their presumed gastric or EHS classification. Analysis of orthologs revealed substantial heterogeneity in physiological and virulence-related genes between gastric and EHS genomes. Metabolic reconstruction predicted that unlike gastric species, EHS appear asaccharolytic and dependent on amino/organic acids to fuel metabolism. Additionally, gastric species lack de novo biosynthetic pathways for several amino acids and purines found in EHS and instead rely on environmental uptake/salvage pathways. Comparison of virulence factor genes between gastric and EHS genomes identified overlapping yet distinct profiles and included canonical cytotoxins, outer membrane proteins, secretion systems, and survival factors. Conclusions The major differences in predicted metabolic function suggest gastric species and EHS may have evolved for survival in the nutrient-rich stomach versus the nutrient-devoid environments, respectively. Contrasting virulence factor gene profiles indicate gastric species and EHS may utilize different pathogenic mechanisms to chronically infect hosts and cause inflammation and tissue damage. The findings from this study provide new insights into the genetic differences underlying gastric versus EHS and support the need for future experimental studies to characterize these pathogens.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:02:26Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/119470
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:02:26Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Biomed Central Ltd
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1194702022-09-30T01:54:43Z Comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic Helicobacter species Mannion, Anthony Shen, Zeli Fox, James G Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Division of Comparative Medicine Mannion, Anthony Shen, Zeli Fox, James G Background The genus Helicobacter are gram-negative, microaerobic, flagellated, mucus-inhabiting bacteria associated with gastrointestinal inflammation and classified as gastric or enterohepatic Helicobacter species (EHS) according to host species and colonization niche. While there are over 30 official species, little is known about the physiology and pathogenic mechanisms of EHS, which account for most in the genus, as well as what genetic factors differentiate gastric versus EHS, given they inhabit different hosts and colonization niches. The objective of this study was to perform a whole-genus comparative analysis of over 100 gastric versus EHS genomes in order to identify genetic determinants that distinguish these Helicobacter species and provide insights about their evolution/adaptation to different hosts, colonization niches, and mechanisms of virulence. Results Whole-genome phylogeny organized Helicobacter species according to their presumed gastric or EHS classification. Analysis of orthologs revealed substantial heterogeneity in physiological and virulence-related genes between gastric and EHS genomes. Metabolic reconstruction predicted that unlike gastric species, EHS appear asaccharolytic and dependent on amino/organic acids to fuel metabolism. Additionally, gastric species lack de novo biosynthetic pathways for several amino acids and purines found in EHS and instead rely on environmental uptake/salvage pathways. Comparison of virulence factor genes between gastric and EHS genomes identified overlapping yet distinct profiles and included canonical cytotoxins, outer membrane proteins, secretion systems, and survival factors. Conclusions The major differences in predicted metabolic function suggest gastric species and EHS may have evolved for survival in the nutrient-rich stomach versus the nutrient-devoid environments, respectively. Contrasting virulence factor gene profiles indicate gastric species and EHS may utilize different pathogenic mechanisms to chronically infect hosts and cause inflammation and tissue damage. The findings from this study provide new insights into the genetic differences underlying gastric versus EHS and support the need for future experimental studies to characterize these pathogens. 2018-12-07T18:10:43Z 2018-12-07T18:10:43Z 2018-11 2018-05 2018-11-26T10:29:54Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1471-2164 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119470 Mannion, Anthony et al. "Comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic Helicobacter species." BMC Genomics 19 (November 2018): 830 © 2018 The Author(s) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9307-6116 en https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5171-2 BMC Genomics Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The Author(s). application/pdf Biomed Central Ltd BioMed Central
spellingShingle Mannion, Anthony
Shen, Zeli
Fox, James G
Comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic Helicobacter species
title Comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic Helicobacter species
title_full Comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic Helicobacter species
title_fullStr Comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic Helicobacter species
title_full_unstemmed Comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic Helicobacter species
title_short Comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic Helicobacter species
title_sort comparative genomics analysis to differentiate metabolic and virulence gene potential in gastric versus enterohepatic helicobacter species
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/119470
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9307-6116
work_keys_str_mv AT mannionanthony comparativegenomicsanalysistodifferentiatemetabolicandvirulencegenepotentialingastricversusenterohepatichelicobacterspecies
AT shenzeli comparativegenomicsanalysistodifferentiatemetabolicandvirulencegenepotentialingastricversusenterohepatichelicobacterspecies
AT foxjamesg comparativegenomicsanalysistodifferentiatemetabolicandvirulencegenepotentialingastricversusenterohepatichelicobacterspecies