Evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present-day simulations of the Community Earth System Model version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-chem): MOZART-4 vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon vs. Super-Fast chemistry

While state-of-the-art complex chemical mechanisms expand our understanding of atmospheric chemistry, their sheer size and computational requirements often limit simulations to short lengths or ensembles to only a few members. Here we present and compare three 25-year present-day offline simulations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tilmes, Simone, Emmons, Louisa, Lamarque, Jean-François, Cameron-Smith, Philip, Brown-Steiner, Benjamin E, Selin, Noelle E, Prinn, Ronald G
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Global Change Science
Format: Article
Published: Copernicus GmbH 2019
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120143
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-5622
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-3801
_version_ 1811086924682625024
author Tilmes, Simone
Emmons, Louisa
Lamarque, Jean-François
Cameron-Smith, Philip
Brown-Steiner, Benjamin E
Selin, Noelle E
Prinn, Ronald G
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Global Change Science
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Global Change Science
Tilmes, Simone
Emmons, Louisa
Lamarque, Jean-François
Cameron-Smith, Philip
Brown-Steiner, Benjamin E
Selin, Noelle E
Prinn, Ronald G
author_sort Tilmes, Simone
collection MIT
description While state-of-the-art complex chemical mechanisms expand our understanding of atmospheric chemistry, their sheer size and computational requirements often limit simulations to short lengths or ensembles to only a few members. Here we present and compare three 25-year present-day offline simulations with chemical mechanisms of different levels of complexity using the Community Earth System Model (CESM) Version 1.2 CAM-chem (CAM4): the Model for Ozone and Related Chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4) mechanism, the Reduced Hydrocarbon mechanism, and the Super-Fast mechanism. We show that, for most regions and time periods, differences in simulated ozone chemistry between these three mechanisms are smaller than the model-observation differences themselves. The MOZART-4 mechanism and the Reduced Hydrocarbon are in close agreement in their representation of ozone throughout the troposphere during all time periods (annual, seasonal, and diurnal). While the Super-Fast mechanism tends to have higher simulated ozone variability and differs from the MOZART-4 mechanism over regions of high biogenic emissions, it is surprisingly capable of simulating ozone adequately given its simplicity. We explore the trade-offs between chemical mechanism complexity and computational cost by identifying regions where the simpler mechanisms are comparable to the MOZART-4 mechanism and regions where they are not. The Super-Fast mechanism is 3 times as fast as the MOZART-4 mechanism, which allows for longer simulations or ensembles with more members that may not be feasible with the MOZART-4 mechanism given limited computational resources.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:36:40Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/120143
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:36:40Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1201432022-09-28T15:02:54Z Evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present-day simulations of the Community Earth System Model version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-chem): MOZART-4 vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon vs. Super-Fast chemistry Tilmes, Simone Emmons, Louisa Lamarque, Jean-François Cameron-Smith, Philip Brown-Steiner, Benjamin E Selin, Noelle E Prinn, Ronald G Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Global Change Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Change Brown-Steiner, Benjamin E Selin, Noelle E Prinn, Ronald G While state-of-the-art complex chemical mechanisms expand our understanding of atmospheric chemistry, their sheer size and computational requirements often limit simulations to short lengths or ensembles to only a few members. Here we present and compare three 25-year present-day offline simulations with chemical mechanisms of different levels of complexity using the Community Earth System Model (CESM) Version 1.2 CAM-chem (CAM4): the Model for Ozone and Related Chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4) mechanism, the Reduced Hydrocarbon mechanism, and the Super-Fast mechanism. We show that, for most regions and time periods, differences in simulated ozone chemistry between these three mechanisms are smaller than the model-observation differences themselves. The MOZART-4 mechanism and the Reduced Hydrocarbon are in close agreement in their representation of ozone throughout the troposphere during all time periods (annual, seasonal, and diurnal). While the Super-Fast mechanism tends to have higher simulated ozone variability and differs from the MOZART-4 mechanism over regions of high biogenic emissions, it is surprisingly capable of simulating ozone adequately given its simplicity. We explore the trade-offs between chemical mechanism complexity and computational cost by identifying regions where the simpler mechanisms are comparable to the MOZART-4 mechanism and regions where they are not. The Super-Fast mechanism is 3 times as fast as the MOZART-4 mechanism, which allows for longer simulations or ensembles with more members that may not be feasible with the MOZART-4 mechanism given limited computational resources. United States. Department of Energy (Grant DE-FG02-94ER61937) 2019-01-29T20:02:41Z 2019-01-29T20:02:41Z 2018-10 2018-08 2019-01-18T16:34:04Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1991-9603 1991-959X http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120143 Brown-Steiner, Benjamin et al. “Evaluating Simplified Chemical Mechanisms Within Present-Day Simulations of the Community Earth System Model Version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-Chem): MOZART-4 Vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon Vs. Super-Fast Chemistry.” Geoscientific Model Development 11, 10 (October 2018): 4155–4174 © 2018 Author(s) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-5622 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-3801 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4155-2018 Geoscientific Model Development Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Copernicus GmbH Copernicus
spellingShingle Tilmes, Simone
Emmons, Louisa
Lamarque, Jean-François
Cameron-Smith, Philip
Brown-Steiner, Benjamin E
Selin, Noelle E
Prinn, Ronald G
Evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present-day simulations of the Community Earth System Model version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-chem): MOZART-4 vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon vs. Super-Fast chemistry
title Evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present-day simulations of the Community Earth System Model version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-chem): MOZART-4 vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon vs. Super-Fast chemistry
title_full Evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present-day simulations of the Community Earth System Model version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-chem): MOZART-4 vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon vs. Super-Fast chemistry
title_fullStr Evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present-day simulations of the Community Earth System Model version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-chem): MOZART-4 vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon vs. Super-Fast chemistry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present-day simulations of the Community Earth System Model version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-chem): MOZART-4 vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon vs. Super-Fast chemistry
title_short Evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present-day simulations of the Community Earth System Model version 1.2 with CAM4 (CESM1.2 CAM-chem): MOZART-4 vs. Reduced Hydrocarbon vs. Super-Fast chemistry
title_sort evaluating simplified chemical mechanisms within present day simulations of the community earth system model version 1 2 with cam4 cesm1 2 cam chem mozart 4 vs reduced hydrocarbon vs super fast chemistry
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120143
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-5622
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-3801
work_keys_str_mv AT tilmessimone evaluatingsimplifiedchemicalmechanismswithinpresentdaysimulationsofthecommunityearthsystemmodelversion12withcam4cesm12camchemmozart4vsreducedhydrocarbonvssuperfastchemistry
AT emmonslouisa evaluatingsimplifiedchemicalmechanismswithinpresentdaysimulationsofthecommunityearthsystemmodelversion12withcam4cesm12camchemmozart4vsreducedhydrocarbonvssuperfastchemistry
AT lamarquejeanfrancois evaluatingsimplifiedchemicalmechanismswithinpresentdaysimulationsofthecommunityearthsystemmodelversion12withcam4cesm12camchemmozart4vsreducedhydrocarbonvssuperfastchemistry
AT cameronsmithphilip evaluatingsimplifiedchemicalmechanismswithinpresentdaysimulationsofthecommunityearthsystemmodelversion12withcam4cesm12camchemmozart4vsreducedhydrocarbonvssuperfastchemistry
AT brownsteinerbenjamine evaluatingsimplifiedchemicalmechanismswithinpresentdaysimulationsofthecommunityearthsystemmodelversion12withcam4cesm12camchemmozart4vsreducedhydrocarbonvssuperfastchemistry
AT selinnoellee evaluatingsimplifiedchemicalmechanismswithinpresentdaysimulationsofthecommunityearthsystemmodelversion12withcam4cesm12camchemmozart4vsreducedhydrocarbonvssuperfastchemistry
AT prinnronaldg evaluatingsimplifiedchemicalmechanismswithinpresentdaysimulationsofthecommunityearthsystemmodelversion12withcam4cesm12camchemmozart4vsreducedhydrocarbonvssuperfastchemistry