Strategic Policy Choice in State-Level Regulation: The EPA's Clean Power Plan
The EPA's Clean Power Plan sets goals for CO₂ emissions rate reductions by 2030 that vary substantially across states. States can choose the regulatory mechanism they use and whether or not to join with other states in implementing their goals. We analyze incentives to adopt rate standards vers...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
American Economic Association
2019
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120751 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7654-8641 |
| Summary: | The EPA's Clean Power Plan sets goals for CO₂ emissions rate reductions by 2030 that vary substantially across states. States can choose the regulatory mechanism they use and whether or not to join with other states in implementing their goals. We analyze incentives to adopt rate standards versus cap-and-trade with theory and simulation. We show conditions where adoption of inefficient rate standards is a dominant strategy from both consumers' and generators' perspectives. Numerical simulations of the western electricity system highlight incentives for uncoordinated policies that lower welfare and increase emissions relative to coordination. |
|---|