Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust
Branigan & Pickering (B&P) claim that the success of structural priming as a method should “end the current reliance on acceptability judgments.” Structural priming is an interesting and useful phenomenon, but we are dubious that the effect is powerful enough to test many detailed claims abo...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
2019
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122804 |
_version_ | 1826193040483549184 |
---|---|
author | Mahowald, Kyle Adam James, Ariel Futrell, Richard Landy Jones Gibson, Edward A |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Mahowald, Kyle Adam James, Ariel Futrell, Richard Landy Jones Gibson, Edward A |
author_sort | Mahowald, Kyle Adam |
collection | MIT |
description | Branigan & Pickering (B&P) claim that the success of structural priming as a method should “end the current reliance on acceptability judgments.” Structural priming is an interesting and useful phenomenon, but we are dubious that the effect is powerful enough to test many detailed claims about specific points of syntactic theory. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T09:33:09Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/122804 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T09:33:09Z |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1228042022-09-26T12:12:31Z Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust Mahowald, Kyle Adam James, Ariel Futrell, Richard Landy Jones Gibson, Edward A Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Branigan & Pickering (B&P) claim that the success of structural priming as a method should “end the current reliance on acceptability judgments.” Structural priming is an interesting and useful phenomenon, but we are dubious that the effect is powerful enough to test many detailed claims about specific points of syntactic theory. 2019-11-08T17:20:35Z 2019-11-08T17:20:35Z 2017 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0140-525X 1469-1825 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122804 Mahowald, Kyle et al. "Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust." Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40 (2017): e302 © 2017 Cambridge University Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x17000504 Behavioral and Brain Sciences Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Cambridge University Press (CUP) Prof. Gibson via Courtney Crummett |
spellingShingle | Mahowald, Kyle Adam James, Ariel Futrell, Richard Landy Jones Gibson, Edward A Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust |
title | Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust |
title_full | Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust |
title_fullStr | Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust |
title_full_unstemmed | Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust |
title_short | Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust |
title_sort | structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahowaldkyleadam structuralprimingismostusefulwhentheconclusionsarestatisticallyrobust AT jamesariel structuralprimingismostusefulwhentheconclusionsarestatisticallyrobust AT futrellrichardlandyjones structuralprimingismostusefulwhentheconclusionsarestatisticallyrobust AT gibsonedwarda structuralprimingismostusefulwhentheconclusionsarestatisticallyrobust |