Mergers that harm sellers
This Feature examines the antitrust treatment of mergers that harm sellers. We separately consider two mechanisms of harm, increased classical monopsony power and increased bargaining leverage. We show that lost upstream competition is an actionable harm to the competitive process. Our central claim...
Main Authors: | Hemphill, C. Scott, Rose, Nancy L |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio Press
2019
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123106 |
Similar Items
-
Short sellers’ accusations against Chinese reverse mergers: Information analytics or guilt by association?
by: Hongqi Liu, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01) -
Mergers and acquisitions from A to Z : strategic and practical guidance for small- and middle-market buyers and sellers /
by: 446020 Sherman, Andrew J.
Published: (1998) -
The Best Seller /
by: Ley, D. Forbes
Published: (1989) - Best sellers
-
Risk management marketing seller
by: L.I. Kucher, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)