Stable Surfaces That Bind Too Tightly: Can Range-Separated Hybrids or DFT+U Improve Paradoxical Descriptions of Surface Chemistry?

Approximate, semilocal density functional theory (DFT) suffers from delocalization error that can lead to a paradoxical model of catalytic surfaces that both overbind adsorbates yet are also too stable. We investigate the effect of two widely applied approaches for delocalization error correction, (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao, Qing, Kulik, Heather Janine
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Chemical Society (ACS) 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123204
_version_ 1826207008620019712
author Zhao, Qing
Kulik, Heather Janine
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Zhao, Qing
Kulik, Heather Janine
author_sort Zhao, Qing
collection MIT
description Approximate, semilocal density functional theory (DFT) suffers from delocalization error that can lead to a paradoxical model of catalytic surfaces that both overbind adsorbates yet are also too stable. We investigate the effect of two widely applied approaches for delocalization error correction, (i) affordable DFT+U (i.e., semilocal DFT augmented with a Hubbard U) and (ii) hybrid functionals with an admixture of Hartree-Fock (HF) exchange, on surface and adsorbate energies across a range of rutile transition metal oxides widely studied for their promise as water-splitting catalysts. We observe strongly row- A nd period-dependent trends with DFT+U, which increases surface formation energies only in early transition metals (e.g., Ti and V) and decreases adsorbate energies only in later transition metals (e.g., Ir and Pt). Both global and local hybrids destabilize surfaces and reduce adsorbate binding across the periodic table, in agreement with higher-level reference calculations. Density analysis reveals why hybrid functionals correct both quantities, whereas DFT+U does not. We recommend local, range-separated hybrids for the accurate modeling of catalysis in transition metal oxides at only a modest increase in computational cost over semilocal DFT.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:42:03Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/123204
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:42:03Z
publishDate 2019
publisher American Chemical Society (ACS)
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1232042022-10-01T16:39:07Z Stable Surfaces That Bind Too Tightly: Can Range-Separated Hybrids or DFT+U Improve Paradoxical Descriptions of Surface Chemistry? Zhao, Qing Kulik, Heather Janine Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering General Materials Science Approximate, semilocal density functional theory (DFT) suffers from delocalization error that can lead to a paradoxical model of catalytic surfaces that both overbind adsorbates yet are also too stable. We investigate the effect of two widely applied approaches for delocalization error correction, (i) affordable DFT+U (i.e., semilocal DFT augmented with a Hubbard U) and (ii) hybrid functionals with an admixture of Hartree-Fock (HF) exchange, on surface and adsorbate energies across a range of rutile transition metal oxides widely studied for their promise as water-splitting catalysts. We observe strongly row- A nd period-dependent trends with DFT+U, which increases surface formation energies only in early transition metals (e.g., Ti and V) and decreases adsorbate energies only in later transition metals (e.g., Ir and Pt). Both global and local hybrids destabilize surfaces and reduce adsorbate binding across the periodic table, in agreement with higher-level reference calculations. Density analysis reveals why hybrid functionals correct both quantities, whereas DFT+U does not. We recommend local, range-separated hybrids for the accurate modeling of catalysis in transition metal oxides at only a modest increase in computational cost over semilocal DFT. 2019-12-10T20:16:02Z 2019-12-10T20:16:02Z 2019-08 2019-06 2019-10-10T15:59:27Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1948-7185 1948-7185 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123204 Zhao, Qing and Heather J. Kulik. "Stable Surfaces That Bind Too Tightly: Can Range-Separated Hybrids or DFT+U Improve Paradoxical Descriptions of Surface Chemistry?." Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 10, 17 (August 2019): 5090-5098 © 2019 American Chemical Society en http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01650 Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf American Chemical Society (ACS) ACS
spellingShingle General Materials Science
Zhao, Qing
Kulik, Heather Janine
Stable Surfaces That Bind Too Tightly: Can Range-Separated Hybrids or DFT+U Improve Paradoxical Descriptions of Surface Chemistry?
title Stable Surfaces That Bind Too Tightly: Can Range-Separated Hybrids or DFT+U Improve Paradoxical Descriptions of Surface Chemistry?
title_full Stable Surfaces That Bind Too Tightly: Can Range-Separated Hybrids or DFT+U Improve Paradoxical Descriptions of Surface Chemistry?
title_fullStr Stable Surfaces That Bind Too Tightly: Can Range-Separated Hybrids or DFT+U Improve Paradoxical Descriptions of Surface Chemistry?
title_full_unstemmed Stable Surfaces That Bind Too Tightly: Can Range-Separated Hybrids or DFT+U Improve Paradoxical Descriptions of Surface Chemistry?
title_short Stable Surfaces That Bind Too Tightly: Can Range-Separated Hybrids or DFT+U Improve Paradoxical Descriptions of Surface Chemistry?
title_sort stable surfaces that bind too tightly can range separated hybrids or dft u improve paradoxical descriptions of surface chemistry
topic General Materials Science
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123204
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoqing stablesurfacesthatbindtootightlycanrangeseparatedhybridsordftuimproveparadoxicaldescriptionsofsurfacechemistry
AT kulikheatherjanine stablesurfacesthatbindtootightlycanrangeseparatedhybridsordftuimproveparadoxicaldescriptionsofsurfacechemistry