Elephants or Goldfish?: An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Markets

A later version of this working paper has been published in a peer-reviewed journal and can be access here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102073

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Acocella, Angela J. (Angela Josephine), Caplice, Chris, Sheffi, Yossi
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Transportation & Logistics
Format: Working Paper
Published: MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics 2020
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123694
_version_ 1826200855341170688
author Acocella, Angela J. (Angela Josephine)
Caplice, Chris
Sheffi, Yossi
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Transportation & Logistics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Transportation & Logistics
Acocella, Angela J. (Angela Josephine)
Caplice, Chris
Sheffi, Yossi
author_sort Acocella, Angela J. (Angela Josephine)
collection MIT
description A later version of this working paper has been published in a peer-reviewed journal and can be access here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102073
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:42:29Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/123694
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:42:29Z
publishDate 2020
publisher MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1236942020-11-16T14:20:26Z Elephants or Goldfish?: An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Markets Acocella, Angela J. (Angela Josephine) Caplice, Chris Sheffi, Yossi Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Transportation & Logistics A later version of this working paper has been published in a peer-reviewed journal and can be access here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102073 Dynamic macroeconomic conditions and non-binding truckload freight contracts enable both shippers and carriers to behave opportunistically. We present an empirical analysis of carrier reciprocity in the US truckload transportation sector to demonstrate whether consistent performance and fair pricing by shippers when markets are in their favor result in maintained primary carrier tender acceptance when markets turn. The results suggest carriers have short memories: they do not remember shippers’ previous period pricing or tendering consistency when making freight acceptance decisions. However, carriers appear to be myopic and respond to shippers’ current market period behaviors, ostensibly without regard to shippers’ previous behaviors. 2020-02-05T14:20:28Z 2020-02-05T14:20:28Z 2020-01-23 Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123694 MIT Global Supply Chain and Logistics Excellence Network Working Paper Series; 2020-mitscale-ctl-01 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102073 application/pdf MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics
spellingShingle Acocella, Angela J. (Angela Josephine)
Caplice, Chris
Sheffi, Yossi
Elephants or Goldfish?: An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Markets
title Elephants or Goldfish?: An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Markets
title_full Elephants or Goldfish?: An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Markets
title_fullStr Elephants or Goldfish?: An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Markets
title_full_unstemmed Elephants or Goldfish?: An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Markets
title_short Elephants or Goldfish?: An Empirical Analysis of Carrier Reciprocity in Dynamic Freight Markets
title_sort elephants or goldfish an empirical analysis of carrier reciprocity in dynamic freight markets
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/123694
work_keys_str_mv AT acocellaangelajangelajosephine elephantsorgoldfishanempiricalanalysisofcarrierreciprocityindynamicfreightmarkets
AT caplicechris elephantsorgoldfishanempiricalanalysisofcarrierreciprocityindynamicfreightmarkets
AT sheffiyossi elephantsorgoldfishanempiricalanalysisofcarrierreciprocityindynamicfreightmarkets