Scope theory revisited : lessons from pied-piping in wh-questions

Thesis: Ph. D. in Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2019

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Demirok, Ömer
Other Authors: Sabine Iatridou, Norvin Richards, and Roger Schwarzschild.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124104
_version_ 1811096342257205248
author Demirok, Ömer
author2 Sabine Iatridou, Norvin Richards, and Roger Schwarzschild.
author_facet Sabine Iatridou, Norvin Richards, and Roger Schwarzschild.
Demirok, Ömer
author_sort Demirok, Ömer
collection MIT
description Thesis: Ph. D. in Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2019
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:42:18Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/124104
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:42:18Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1241042020-03-10T03:01:13Z Scope theory revisited : lessons from pied-piping in wh-questions Lessons from pied-piping in wh-questions Demirok, Ömer Sabine Iatridou, Norvin Richards, and Roger Schwarzschild. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Linguistics and Philosophy. Thesis: Ph. D. in Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2019 Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 187-195). It is widely assumed that both the movement-based theory of scope and the scope-based theory of intensionality fall short in the face of empirical challenges like 'exceptional' scope out of extraction islands and the possibility of transparent/de re construals for DPs inside extraction islands. The standard response to these challenges consists in assuming that grammar makes available in-situ methods of scope-taking in addition to movement- (e.g. pointwise composition (Hamblin, 1973; Kratzer and Shimoyama, 2002; Cable, 2010), choice functions (Reinhart, 1997, 1998)) and adopting a richer representation of intensionality (e.g. in-situ binding of world/situation-denoting pronouns (Percus, 2000)). This thesis argues that a closer study of pied-piping in wh-questions reveals the true power of already-existing tools in grammar. Building on the important insight that more complex scope-takers can be recursively built (Dayal, 1994; Charlow, 2017), I advance the idea that grammar makes crucial use of pied-piping to generate meanings that would otherwise be unavailable. I argue that with pied-piping in its toolbox, grammar may not need in-situ methods of scope-taking and in-situ methods of assigning DPs a transparent/de re construal. by Ömer Demirok. Ph. D. in Linguistics Ph.D.inLinguistics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy 2020-03-09T18:53:40Z 2020-03-09T18:53:40Z 2019 2019 Thesis https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124104 1142635477 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 195 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Linguistics and Philosophy.
Demirok, Ömer
Scope theory revisited : lessons from pied-piping in wh-questions
title Scope theory revisited : lessons from pied-piping in wh-questions
title_full Scope theory revisited : lessons from pied-piping in wh-questions
title_fullStr Scope theory revisited : lessons from pied-piping in wh-questions
title_full_unstemmed Scope theory revisited : lessons from pied-piping in wh-questions
title_short Scope theory revisited : lessons from pied-piping in wh-questions
title_sort scope theory revisited lessons from pied piping in wh questions
topic Linguistics and Philosophy.
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124104
work_keys_str_mv AT demirokomer scopetheoryrevisitedlessonsfrompiedpipinginwhquestions
AT demirokomer lessonsfrompiedpipinginwhquestions