Sooner is better : covert action to prevent realignment

Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Political Science, 2019

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nutt, Cullen Gifford.
Other Authors: Barry R. Posen.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124273
_version_ 1826194046682398720
author Nutt, Cullen Gifford.
author2 Barry R. Posen.
author_facet Barry R. Posen.
Nutt, Cullen Gifford.
author_sort Nutt, Cullen Gifford.
collection MIT
description Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Political Science, 2019
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:49:40Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/124273
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:49:40Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1242732020-03-25T03:34:25Z Sooner is better : covert action to prevent realignment Covert action to prevent realignment Nutt, Cullen Gifford. Barry R. Posen. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science Political Science. Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Political Science, 2019 Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 301-308). Why do states intervene covertly in some places and not others? This is a pressing question for theorists and policymakers because covert action is widespread, costly, and consequential. I argue that states wield it-whether by supporting political parties, arming dissidents, sponsoring coups, or assassinating leaders-when they fear that a target is at risk of shifting its alignment toward the state that the intervener considers most threatening. Covert action is a rational response to the threat of realignment. Interveners correctly recognize a window of opportunity: Owing to its circumscribed nature, covert action is more likely to be effective before realignment than after. This means that acting sooner is better. I test this argument in case studies of covert action decision-making by the United States in Indonesia, Iraq, and Portugal. I then conduct a test of the theory's power in a medium-N analysis of 97 cases of serious consideration of such action by the United States during the Cold War. Interveners, I suggest, do not employ covert action as a result of bias on the part of intelligence agencies. Nor do they use it to add to their power. Rather, states act covertly when they fear international realignment. by Cullen Gifford Nutt. Ph. D. Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Political Science 2020-03-24T15:37:25Z 2020-03-24T15:37:25Z 2019 2019 Thesis https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124273 1144176185 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 308 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Political Science.
Nutt, Cullen Gifford.
Sooner is better : covert action to prevent realignment
title Sooner is better : covert action to prevent realignment
title_full Sooner is better : covert action to prevent realignment
title_fullStr Sooner is better : covert action to prevent realignment
title_full_unstemmed Sooner is better : covert action to prevent realignment
title_short Sooner is better : covert action to prevent realignment
title_sort sooner is better covert action to prevent realignment
topic Political Science.
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124273
work_keys_str_mv AT nuttcullengifford soonerisbettercovertactiontopreventrealignment
AT nuttcullengifford covertactiontopreventrealignment