Impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee

Background: An above knee amputation can have a significant impact on gait, with substantial deviations in inter-leg symmetry, step length, hip exertion and upper body involvement even when using a current clinical standard of care prosthesis. These differences can produce gait that is less efficien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Williams, Matthew R., D’Andrea, Susan, Herr, Hugh M
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2020
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124402
_version_ 1811097625111298048
author Williams, Matthew R.
D’Andrea, Susan
Herr, Hugh M
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory
Williams, Matthew R.
D’Andrea, Susan
Herr, Hugh M
author_sort Williams, Matthew R.
collection MIT
description Background: An above knee amputation can have a significant impact on gait, with substantial deviations in inter-leg symmetry, step length, hip exertion and upper body involvement even when using a current clinical standard of care prosthesis. These differences can produce gait that is less efficient and less comfortable, resulting in slower and shorter distance walking, particularly with long term use. Methods: A robotic variable impedance prosthetic knee (VI Knee) was tested with five individuals (N = 5) with unilateral amputation above the knee at fixed speeds both above and below their normal walking speed. Subject gait was measured as they walked along an instrumented walkway via optical motion capture and force plates in the floor. Each subject's gait while using the VI Knee was compared to that while using their standard of care knee (OttoBock C-Leg). Results: Significant differences (p < 0.05) in walking between the standard of care and variable impedance devices were seen in step length and hip range of motion symmetries, hip extension moment, knee power and torso lean angle. While using the VI Knee, several subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in gait, particularly in increased hip range of motion symmetry between affected and intact sides, greater prosthesis knee power and in reducing upper body involvement in the walking task by decreasing forward and affected side lean and reducing the pelvis-torso twist coupling. These changes to torso posture during gait also resulted in increased terminal stance hip flexion moment across subjects. Detriments to gait were also observed in that some subjects exhibited decreased step length symmetry while using the VI Knee compared to the C-Leg. Conclusions: The knee tested represents the potential to improve gait biomechanics and reduce upper body involvement in persons with above knee amputation compared to current standard of care devices. While using the VI Knee, subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in several aspects of gait though some were worsened while using the device. It is possible that these negative effects may be mitigated through longer term training and experience with the VI Knee. Given the demonstrated benefits and the potential to reduce or eliminate detriments through training, using a powered device like the VI Knee, particularly over an extended period of time, may help to improve walking performance and comfort. Keywords: Variable Impedance; Affected Side; Intact Side; Knee Amputation; Prosthetic Knee
first_indexed 2024-09-23T17:02:26Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/124402
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T17:02:26Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1244022022-09-29T23:15:49Z Impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee Williams, Matthew R. D’Andrea, Susan Herr, Hugh M Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory Background: An above knee amputation can have a significant impact on gait, with substantial deviations in inter-leg symmetry, step length, hip exertion and upper body involvement even when using a current clinical standard of care prosthesis. These differences can produce gait that is less efficient and less comfortable, resulting in slower and shorter distance walking, particularly with long term use. Methods: A robotic variable impedance prosthetic knee (VI Knee) was tested with five individuals (N = 5) with unilateral amputation above the knee at fixed speeds both above and below their normal walking speed. Subject gait was measured as they walked along an instrumented walkway via optical motion capture and force plates in the floor. Each subject's gait while using the VI Knee was compared to that while using their standard of care knee (OttoBock C-Leg). Results: Significant differences (p < 0.05) in walking between the standard of care and variable impedance devices were seen in step length and hip range of motion symmetries, hip extension moment, knee power and torso lean angle. While using the VI Knee, several subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in gait, particularly in increased hip range of motion symmetry between affected and intact sides, greater prosthesis knee power and in reducing upper body involvement in the walking task by decreasing forward and affected side lean and reducing the pelvis-torso twist coupling. These changes to torso posture during gait also resulted in increased terminal stance hip flexion moment across subjects. Detriments to gait were also observed in that some subjects exhibited decreased step length symmetry while using the VI Knee compared to the C-Leg. Conclusions: The knee tested represents the potential to improve gait biomechanics and reduce upper body involvement in persons with above knee amputation compared to current standard of care devices. While using the VI Knee, subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in several aspects of gait though some were worsened while using the device. It is possible that these negative effects may be mitigated through longer term training and experience with the VI Knee. Given the demonstrated benefits and the potential to reduce or eliminate detriments through training, using a powered device like the VI Knee, particularly over an extended period of time, may help to improve walking performance and comfort. Keywords: Variable Impedance; Affected Side; Intact Side; Knee Amputation; Prosthetic Knee VA Career Development Award (VA CDA-I A7322-M) VA Center for Restorative and Regenerative Medicine (VA A3772C) U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC W81XWH-07-1-0689) 2020-03-30T13:25:31Z 2020-03-30T13:25:31Z 2016-06 2015-07 2019-07-22T16:19:56Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1743-0003 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124402 Williams, Matthew R., D'Andrea, Susan, and Herr, Hugh M. "Impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee." Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 13 (June 2016): 54 © 2016 The Author(s). en http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0159-0 Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Springer Science and Business Media LLC BioMed Central (BMC)
spellingShingle Williams, Matthew R.
D’Andrea, Susan
Herr, Hugh M
Impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee
title Impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee
title_full Impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee
title_fullStr Impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee
title_full_unstemmed Impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee
title_short Impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee
title_sort impact on gait biomechanics of using an active variable impedance prosthetic knee
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124402
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsmatthewr impactongaitbiomechanicsofusinganactivevariableimpedanceprostheticknee
AT dandreasusan impactongaitbiomechanicsofusinganactivevariableimpedanceprostheticknee
AT herrhughm impactongaitbiomechanicsofusinganactivevariableimpedanceprostheticknee