Children’s quantification with every over time

This article looks closely at two types of errors children have been shown to make with universal quantification—Exhaustive Pairing (EP) errors and Underexhaustive errors—and asks whether they reflect the same underlying phenomenon. In a large-scale, longitudinal study, 140 children were tested 4 ti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aravind, Athulya, De Villiers, Jill, De Villiers, Peter, Lonigan, Christopher J., Phillips, Beth M., Clancy, Jeanine, Landry, Susan H., Swank, Paul R., Assel, Michael, Taylor, Heather B., Eisenberg, Nancy, Spinrad, Tracy, Valiente, Carlos
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Published: Ubiquity Press, Ltd. 2020
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124478
_version_ 1811069981522132992
author Aravind, Athulya
De Villiers, Jill
De Villiers, Peter
Lonigan, Christopher J.
Phillips, Beth M.
Clancy, Jeanine
Landry, Susan H.
Swank, Paul R.
Assel, Michael
Taylor, Heather B.
Eisenberg, Nancy
Spinrad, Tracy
Valiente, Carlos
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Aravind, Athulya
De Villiers, Jill
De Villiers, Peter
Lonigan, Christopher J.
Phillips, Beth M.
Clancy, Jeanine
Landry, Susan H.
Swank, Paul R.
Assel, Michael
Taylor, Heather B.
Eisenberg, Nancy
Spinrad, Tracy
Valiente, Carlos
author_sort Aravind, Athulya
collection MIT
description This article looks closely at two types of errors children have been shown to make with universal quantification—Exhaustive Pairing (EP) errors and Underexhaustive errors—and asks whether they reflect the same underlying phenomenon. In a large-scale, longitudinal study, 140 children were tested 4 times from ages 4 to 7 on sentences involving the universal quantifier every. We find an interesting inverse relationship between EP errors and Underexhaustive errors over development: the point at which children stop making Underexhaustive errors is also when they begin making EP errors. Underexhaustive errors, common at early stages in our study, may be indicative of a non-adult, non-exhaustive semantics for every. EP errors, which emerge later, and remain frequent even at age 7, are progressive in nature and were also found with adults in a control study. Following recent developmental work (Drozd and van Loosbroek 2006; Smits 2010), we suggest that these errors do not signal lack of knowledge, but may stem from independent difficulties appropriately restricting the quantifier domain in the presence of a salient, but irrelevant, extra object.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:19:59Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/124478
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:19:59Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1244782022-09-23T12:23:12Z Children’s quantification with every over time Aravind, Athulya De Villiers, Jill De Villiers, Peter Lonigan, Christopher J. Phillips, Beth M. Clancy, Jeanine Landry, Susan H. Swank, Paul R. Assel, Michael Taylor, Heather B. Eisenberg, Nancy Spinrad, Tracy Valiente, Carlos Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy This article looks closely at two types of errors children have been shown to make with universal quantification—Exhaustive Pairing (EP) errors and Underexhaustive errors—and asks whether they reflect the same underlying phenomenon. In a large-scale, longitudinal study, 140 children were tested 4 times from ages 4 to 7 on sentences involving the universal quantifier every. We find an interesting inverse relationship between EP errors and Underexhaustive errors over development: the point at which children stop making Underexhaustive errors is also when they begin making EP errors. Underexhaustive errors, common at early stages in our study, may be indicative of a non-adult, non-exhaustive semantics for every. EP errors, which emerge later, and remain frequent even at age 7, are progressive in nature and were also found with adults in a control study. Following recent developmental work (Drozd and van Loosbroek 2006; Smits 2010), we suggest that these errors do not signal lack of knowledge, but may stem from independent difficulties appropriately restricting the quantifier domain in the presence of a salient, but irrelevant, extra object. National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD) (Grant P01HD048497) 2020-04-02T14:34:41Z 2020-04-02T14:34:41Z 2017-05 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 2397-1835 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124478 Aravind, Athulya et al. "Children’s quantification with every over time." Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2, 1 (May 2017): 43. 1–43.16 © 2017 The Author(s) http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.166 Glossa Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Ubiquity Press, Ltd. Glossa
spellingShingle Aravind, Athulya
De Villiers, Jill
De Villiers, Peter
Lonigan, Christopher J.
Phillips, Beth M.
Clancy, Jeanine
Landry, Susan H.
Swank, Paul R.
Assel, Michael
Taylor, Heather B.
Eisenberg, Nancy
Spinrad, Tracy
Valiente, Carlos
Children’s quantification with every over time
title Children’s quantification with every over time
title_full Children’s quantification with every over time
title_fullStr Children’s quantification with every over time
title_full_unstemmed Children’s quantification with every over time
title_short Children’s quantification with every over time
title_sort children s quantification with every over time
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/124478
work_keys_str_mv AT aravindathulya childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT devilliersjill childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT devillierspeter childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT loniganchristopherj childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT phillipsbethm childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT clancyjeanine childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT landrysusanh childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT swankpaulr childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT asselmichael childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT taylorheatherb childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT eisenbergnancy childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT spinradtracy childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime
AT valientecarlos childrensquantificationwitheveryovertime