Pretrial negotiations under optimism

We develop a tractable and versatile model of pretrial negotiation in which the negotiating parties are optimistic about the judge's decision and anticipate the possible arrival of public information about the case prior to the trial date. The parties will settle immediately upon the arrival of...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
Main Authors: Vasserman, Shoshana, Yildiz, Muhamet
其他作者: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
格式: 文件
语言:English
出版: Wiley 2020
在线阅读:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125000
_version_ 1826201055849873408
author Vasserman, Shoshana
Yildiz, Muhamet
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
Vasserman, Shoshana
Yildiz, Muhamet
author_sort Vasserman, Shoshana
collection MIT
description We develop a tractable and versatile model of pretrial negotiation in which the negotiating parties are optimistic about the judge's decision and anticipate the possible arrival of public information about the case prior to the trial date. The parties will settle immediately upon the arrival of information. However, they may also agree to settle prior to an arrival. We derive the settlement dynamics prior to an arrival: negotiations result in either immediate agreement, a weak deadline effect—settling at a particular date before the deadline, a strong deadline effect—settling at the deadline, or impasse, depending on the level of optimism. Our findings match stylized facts.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:45:58Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/125000
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:45:58Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1250002022-09-27T21:46:17Z Pretrial negotiations under optimism Vasserman, Shoshana Yildiz, Muhamet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics We develop a tractable and versatile model of pretrial negotiation in which the negotiating parties are optimistic about the judge's decision and anticipate the possible arrival of public information about the case prior to the trial date. The parties will settle immediately upon the arrival of information. However, they may also agree to settle prior to an arrival. We derive the settlement dynamics prior to an arrival: negotiations result in either immediate agreement, a weak deadline effect—settling at a particular date before the deadline, a strong deadline effect—settling at the deadline, or impasse, depending on the level of optimism. Our findings match stylized facts. 2020-05-04T20:07:49Z 2020-05-04T20:07:49Z 2019-04 2019-10-23T16:43:40Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0741-6261 1756-2171 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125000 Vasserman, Shoshana, and Muhamet Yildiz. “Pretrial Negotiations under Optimism.” The RAND Journal of Economics 50, 2 (June 2019): 359–90. en http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12273 RAND Journal of Economics Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Wiley other univ website
spellingShingle Vasserman, Shoshana
Yildiz, Muhamet
Pretrial negotiations under optimism
title Pretrial negotiations under optimism
title_full Pretrial negotiations under optimism
title_fullStr Pretrial negotiations under optimism
title_full_unstemmed Pretrial negotiations under optimism
title_short Pretrial negotiations under optimism
title_sort pretrial negotiations under optimism
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125000
work_keys_str_mv AT vassermanshoshana pretrialnegotiationsunderoptimism
AT yildizmuhamet pretrialnegotiationsunderoptimism