The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being

Earth’s per capita energy use continues to grow, despite technological advances and widespread calls for reduction in energy consumption. The negative environmental consequences are well known: resource depletion, pollution, and global warming. However many remain reluctant to cut energy consumption...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam, Altman, Micah
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Libraries
Format: Article
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2020
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125432
_version_ 1811078056859664384
author Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam
Altman, Micah
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Libraries
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Libraries
Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam
Altman, Micah
author_sort Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam
collection MIT
description Earth’s per capita energy use continues to grow, despite technological advances and widespread calls for reduction in energy consumption. The negative environmental consequences are well known: resource depletion, pollution, and global warming. However many remain reluctant to cut energy consumption because of the widespread, although, implicit, belief that a nation’s well being depends on its energy consumption. This article systematically examines the evidential support for the relationship between energy use and subjective well-being at the societal level, by integrating data from multiple sources, collected at multiple levels of government, and spanning four decades. This analysis reveals, surprisingly, that the most common measure of subjective well-being, life satisfaction, is unrelated to energy use -- whether measured at the national, state or county level. The nil relationship between happiness and energy use is reminiscent of the well-known Easterlin Paradox, however the causal mechanisms responsible to each remain in question. We discuss the possible causes for the Happiness-Energy paradox and potential policy implications.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:52:42Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/125432
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:52:42Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1254322022-09-27T15:41:11Z The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam Altman, Micah Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Libraries Earth’s per capita energy use continues to grow, despite technological advances and widespread calls for reduction in energy consumption. The negative environmental consequences are well known: resource depletion, pollution, and global warming. However many remain reluctant to cut energy consumption because of the widespread, although, implicit, belief that a nation’s well being depends on its energy consumption. This article systematically examines the evidential support for the relationship between energy use and subjective well-being at the societal level, by integrating data from multiple sources, collected at multiple levels of government, and spanning four decades. This analysis reveals, surprisingly, that the most common measure of subjective well-being, life satisfaction, is unrelated to energy use -- whether measured at the national, state or county level. The nil relationship between happiness and energy use is reminiscent of the well-known Easterlin Paradox, however the causal mechanisms responsible to each remain in question. We discuss the possible causes for the Happiness-Energy paradox and potential policy implications. 2020-05-22T20:29:12Z 2020-05-22T20:29:12Z 2019-03 2018-04 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1871-2584 1871-2576 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125432 Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam and Micah Altman. "The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being." Applied Research in Quality of Life (March 2019) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09719-y Applied Research in Quality of Life Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Springer Science and Business Media LLC Micah Altman
spellingShingle Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam
Altman, Micah
The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being
title The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being
title_full The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being
title_fullStr The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being
title_full_unstemmed The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being
title_short The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being
title_sort happiness energy paradox energy use is unrelated to subjective well being
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125432
work_keys_str_mv AT okuliczkozarynadam thehappinessenergyparadoxenergyuseisunrelatedtosubjectivewellbeing
AT altmanmicah thehappinessenergyparadoxenergyuseisunrelatedtosubjectivewellbeing
AT okuliczkozarynadam happinessenergyparadoxenergyuseisunrelatedtosubjectivewellbeing
AT altmanmicah happinessenergyparadoxenergyuseisunrelatedtosubjectivewellbeing