Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure

Sulfate geoengineering is a proposed method to partially counteract the global radiative forcing from accumulated greenhouse gases, potentially mitigating some impacts of climate change. While likely to be effective in slowing increases in average temperatures and extreme precipitation, there are kn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eastham, Sebastian David, Weisenstein, Debra K., Keith, David W., Barrett, Steven R. H.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier BV 2020
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126693
_version_ 1811088668955246592
author Eastham, Sebastian David
Weisenstein, Debra K.
Keith, David W.
Barrett, Steven R. H.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment
Eastham, Sebastian David
Weisenstein, Debra K.
Keith, David W.
Barrett, Steven R. H.
author_sort Eastham, Sebastian David
collection MIT
description Sulfate geoengineering is a proposed method to partially counteract the global radiative forcing from accumulated greenhouse gases, potentially mitigating some impacts of climate change. While likely to be effective in slowing increases in average temperatures and extreme precipitation, there are known side-effects and potential unintended consequences which have not been quantified. One such consequence is the direct human health impact. Given the significant uncertainties, we take a sensitivity approach to explore the mechanisms and range of potential impacts. Using a chemistry-transport model, we quantify the steady-state response of three public health risks to 1 °C global mean surface cooling. We separate impacts into those which are “radiative forcing-driven”, associated with climate change “reversal” through modification of global radiative forcing, and those “direct impacts” associated uniquely with using sulfate geoengineering to achieve this. We find that the direct (non-radiative forcing driven) impact is a decrease in global mortality of ∼13,000 annually. Here the benefits of reduced ozone exposure exceed increases in mortality due to UV and particulate matter, as each unit of injected sulfur incurs 1/25th the particulate matter exposure of a unit of sulfur emitted from surface sources. This reduction is exceeded by radiative forcing-driven health impacts resulting from using sulfate geoengineering to offset 1 °C of surface temperature rise. Increased particulate matter formation at these lower temperatures results in ∼39,000 mortalities which would have been avoided at higher temperatures. As such we estimate that sulfate geoengineering in 2040 would cause ∼26,000 (95% interval: −30,000 to +79,000) early deaths annually relative to the same year without geoengineering, largely due to the loss of health benefits associated with CO2-induced warming. These results account only for impacts due to changes in air quality and UV-B flux. They do not account for non-mortality impacts or changes in atmospheric dynamics, and must be considered in the wider context of other climate change impacts such as heatwave frequency and sea level rise.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:05:39Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/126693
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:05:39Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier BV
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1266932022-10-01T19:09:37Z Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure Eastham, Sebastian David Weisenstein, Debra K. Keith, David W. Barrett, Steven R. H. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Sulfate geoengineering is a proposed method to partially counteract the global radiative forcing from accumulated greenhouse gases, potentially mitigating some impacts of climate change. While likely to be effective in slowing increases in average temperatures and extreme precipitation, there are known side-effects and potential unintended consequences which have not been quantified. One such consequence is the direct human health impact. Given the significant uncertainties, we take a sensitivity approach to explore the mechanisms and range of potential impacts. Using a chemistry-transport model, we quantify the steady-state response of three public health risks to 1 °C global mean surface cooling. We separate impacts into those which are “radiative forcing-driven”, associated with climate change “reversal” through modification of global radiative forcing, and those “direct impacts” associated uniquely with using sulfate geoengineering to achieve this. We find that the direct (non-radiative forcing driven) impact is a decrease in global mortality of ∼13,000 annually. Here the benefits of reduced ozone exposure exceed increases in mortality due to UV and particulate matter, as each unit of injected sulfur incurs 1/25th the particulate matter exposure of a unit of sulfur emitted from surface sources. This reduction is exceeded by radiative forcing-driven health impacts resulting from using sulfate geoengineering to offset 1 °C of surface temperature rise. Increased particulate matter formation at these lower temperatures results in ∼39,000 mortalities which would have been avoided at higher temperatures. As such we estimate that sulfate geoengineering in 2040 would cause ∼26,000 (95% interval: −30,000 to +79,000) early deaths annually relative to the same year without geoengineering, largely due to the loss of health benefits associated with CO2-induced warming. These results account only for impacts due to changes in air quality and UV-B flux. They do not account for non-mortality impacts or changes in atmospheric dynamics, and must be considered in the wider context of other climate change impacts such as heatwave frequency and sea level rise. 2020-08-20T01:18:16Z 2020-08-20T01:18:16Z 2018-08 2018-05 2019-10-24T13:04:55Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1352-2310 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126693 Eastham, Sebastian D. et al. "Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure." Atmospheric Environment 187 (August 2018): 424-434 © 2018 Elsevier Ltd en http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.047 Atmospheric Environment Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Elsevier BV other univ website
spellingShingle Eastham, Sebastian David
Weisenstein, Debra K.
Keith, David W.
Barrett, Steven R. H.
Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure
title Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure
title_full Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure
title_fullStr Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure
title_short Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure
title_sort quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and uv b exposure
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126693
work_keys_str_mv AT easthamsebastiandavid quantifyingtheimpactofsulfategeoengineeringonmortalityfromairqualityanduvbexposure
AT weisensteindebrak quantifyingtheimpactofsulfategeoengineeringonmortalityfromairqualityanduvbexposure
AT keithdavidw quantifyingtheimpactofsulfategeoengineeringonmortalityfromairqualityanduvbexposure
AT barrettstevenrh quantifyingtheimpactofsulfategeoengineeringonmortalityfromairqualityanduvbexposure